• floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    157
    ·
    17 days ago

    Deduct. And the USA is taking the world in completely the opposite direction from where it needs to go.

  • Thomas@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    109
    ·
    17 days ago

    Finally! Do you have an idea how expensive those things are and how much my wage slaves must work for that?

  • Typhoon@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    The law, in its majestic equality, allows rich and poor alike to deduct private jet expenses from their taxes.

    • Taldan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      17 days ago

      To be fair, you don’t have to be rich to buy a Cessna 150. $35,000 can get you a nice old one

      Issue is with taking advantage of the tax benefits

        • Taldan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 days ago

          Yes. My point was that’s less than the average new car, which most Americans buy. The average American could own one if they wanted

      • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 days ago

        The cost of the plane is trivial compared to upkeep, hangar rental, fuel, and myriad other expenses.

        Sure, you can buy a plane for cheap, if you plan to keep it at your house somehow and never intend to use it.

        • Taldan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 days ago

          That’s true for many planes, but not a Cessna 150. Hangars are generally very cheap, if you can get one. Depends on the area, but couple hundred dollars per month. Fuel mileage is comparable to most SUVs and trucks. Insurance is cheaper than car insurance, although maintenance is a bit higher

          I don’t own a car, but I do own a plane. It has been cheaper for me than the average American pays each year for their cars

  • Destide@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    17 days ago

    You allowed this before proper health care because that’s Socialism? Communism? Gay?

    • Taldan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 days ago

      To be fair, America has the best aviation infrastructure in the world, and it is almost entirely socialized. So we do socialism sometimes

  • nonentity@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 days ago

    Financial obesity is an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

    Corporations are the only ‘persons’ which should be subjected to capital punishment, but billionaires should be euthanised through taxation.

    • callcc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      16 days ago

      I like the that term. Just like obese personality for people who need large cars or are excessively loud.

    • buttnugget@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 days ago

      Calling it financial obesity makes it sound like a good thing. These are superfluous parasites.

      • nonentity@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 days ago

        Any reality where financial obesity can me interpreted as a positive or desirable notion must conjure other fascinating paradoxes, please tell us more…

        • buttnugget@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          16 days ago

          Who’s us? Obesity just conjures up images of fat people. Normal decent folks. So if you’re talking about “financial obesity”, you’re just describing normal decent people, not superfluous parasites.

          • nonentity@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            16 days ago

            Obesity is a term which explicitly defines an entity which has accumulated an excess of resources, to the point of causing damage to itself and the environment it inhabits.

            If obesity conjures representations of normality for you, that’s a function of the gravitational distortion inherent from your current perspective.

            Finally, I invoke this notion as literally a medically morbidly obese middle aged white guy, but I’d easily pass for a medium as a Seppo.

  • chillpanzee@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    It’s bonus depreciaton, not expenses, and it’s a business tax benefit, not an individual tax benefit.

    Businesses can, and for a long time, have been able to deduct aircraft expenses. Nothing has changed there, and it’s not unique to this turd of a president. The return of bonus depreciation lets them depreciate faster, but again, depreciation is not new. It’s reasonable to removed about that, but you have to get every fact wrong to make that complaint.

    • Treczoks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      17 days ago

      And let me tell you how this works with cars. With planes it is the same, except that the savings are even better.

      A real rich person owns no cars. He owns a car sales company. That company has a few select cars, which the rich person can “test drive” whenever they like. If the prime time of a car is over, the car is sold and a new one is bought. The car sales company pays for everything: purchase, insurance, taxes, fuel, cleaning, etc. Of course, this company does not make any profits. On the contrary. So the rich person pays for these losses, and those payments are tax deductable.

      • BanMe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        17 days ago

        This also applies to houses, boats, and inevitably surrogates now that they’re using them like pack mules.