Fuck the stupid morons who defend Apple.

Imagine if Microsoft banned Windows users from installing the software they want on their computer.

Imagine if Microsoft required all software developers to give them 30% of their earning or Microsoft will ban them from Windows

  • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    2 months ago

    Hating on Apple for their 30% cut is popular.

    Hating on Google for their 30% cut is popular.

    Hating on Microfot, Sony, and Nintendo for their cuts is popular.

    But somehow hating on Steam for their 30% cut is going too far.

    • dwazou@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Microsoft, Apple, Exxon, Meta, Amazon, JP Morgan or Saudi Aramco are the most powerful corporations in the world. They are empires more powerful than many nations. Their CEOs always travel with armed men. They have the personal phone number of Donald Trump and Xi Jinping.

      It’s healthy to scrutinize them. Steam is a problem, but Valve is nowhere near as powerful.

    • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’d like to see a game developer chiming in but as a user, 30% cut by Steam feels justified.

      They have helped me discover and buy many games that I wouldn’t have even heard of otherwise. Compare that to Google Play Store which is full of dogshit shovelware and Pay2Win games.

      And sometimes I’ve even bought Steam keys via Fanatical bundles, where I chose which games to buy by looking at their Steam store pages. Steam got nothing from these transactions as far as I know.

      This is without getting into other useful stuff like guides and forums hosted by Steam which I can look at whenever I get stuck. Or Steam workshop which allows users to easily mod the games.

      Call me a fanboy but I’m tired of this ‘what about Steam’ comments.

      Ask Sony, Microsoft, Google, and Nintendo to improve their stores instead.

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      You get value from Steam for paying that.

      What value do you get from Apple for paying the Apple tax? A higher price for a phone that could cost 500€ less?

      • Semperverus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        As a Linux gamer, valve making proton has launched gaming on linux into the stratosphere.

      • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        What exactly is the value that steam provides with its 30% cut that Apple doesn’t provide? Not defending Apple by the way.

        Openness of the hardware is a valid point but that isn’t exactly a feature of steam (nor a distinction between the other platforms in OPs comment)

        • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Apple forces me to stay there.
          Valve offers me to stay there. The whole market and review system is incredibly important as I can see if it’s even worth it to buy. Where else can you see reviews besides comparing numerous comments under video reviews?

          • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            If you delete your steam account or decide you no longer want to ise their login/launcher or Valve decides to ban you, what happens to all your past purchases?

            You’re locked in. You just have Stockholm Syndrome for the company that started the online requirement bullshit everything has today by locking Half-Life 2 behind a mandatory online service, then letting other devs force the same bullshit instead of just loading up a disc and playing the game.

            • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              I can certainly close my account and install games from other store fronts on my PC.
              Valve is neither forcing me on my SteamDeck nor on my PC to use Steam.
              I use emulators on my deck and also installed EA Origin and successfully launched titles on it.

              And Apple was only recently forced to allow devs outlinks to their respective shopping pages (currently only in the US). Just the priviledge to link users to the subscription page to circumvent apple trying to get a cut.
              That is actually lock in.
              On Android I can do what I want. And if I so desire I could install an alternative OS on it.
              Try that with an iPhone.

      • ThirdConsul@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        2 months ago

        You get value from Steam for paying that

        Are you crazy? You know how much money that is? And this isn’t taken from the distributors cut we get higher 30% prices because of it.

        • Kaiserschmarrn@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Do you have any example for this? Because in my experience, games on Steam cost literally the same amount as everywhere else and sometimes are even a bit cheaper than that.

          • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            That’s part of the problem. If they charged the same to developers as Epic, I wouldn’t be so critical.

            For games primarily sold through Steam, Steam is often the most expensive part of the game. Is it okay that Steam’s take is higher than that of all the actual developers combined?

            Have you ever played a game that was actually worth playing and thought that the fucking storefront and game launcher were worth 30% of the game?

            Have you played a bunch of half-baked PC ports that could’ve used a bit more money on finishing the game?

            Developers decide to launch as-is partpy because they know Steam will be taking a massive cut and there will be no ROI for fixing the game.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Steam is not the only means of distribution anywhere, and you can often buy the same game both from Steam and directly.

      It’s too early to hate it.

      (Well, I mean, I want a FreeBSD native Steam client with native Proton and all infrastructure, but I can understand that it’s a small percentage, even if not that different from Linux support.)

    • rbits@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I agree that the 30% cut is too much. The only reason I give them a pass is because Steam is really good (at least, as a user). But I still want them to lower it.

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        For a dev those 30% are very much worth it because Steam has tons of customers and very good recommendation algorithms, you gain more in additional sales than what you lose from the cut. Could they do with less probably but they’re not extorting devs. There’s a reason why Epic had to do stuff like guarantee sales and provide huge advances to get anyone onto their excuse for a platform.

    • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      I get why people like steam. But as a steam hater, if GabeN ever dies and the kids or whoever is heirs are decide to sell to VCs or private equity. That 30% will be just as oppressive as anyone else’s.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      “Eat the rich!”

      “Including Gabe?”

      “Woooow there cowboy!”

      I hate the hypocrisy.

      • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Gaben is a hardcore libertarian as well. And owns a billion dollar armada of yachts.

        No he’s one of the good ones /s

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Valve’s response to George Floyd was to give each employee a certain amount of money and let them choose which charity to give it to (if they did give it to charity), which means they could just as well give it to an anti BLM movement if they wanted to.

    • Cossty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      Steam’s 30% is the last of their problems, I would like them to finally start actually moderating Steam forums. Because devs of the particular game usually don’t care. Visit some forums of newly released popular game and it’s full of bigots, misogyny, trolls and hate. It’s unbelievable.

      Go check oblivion remastered

      • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Bigots, Misogyny, Trolls & Hate is translation for I want people censored because I am on a power-trip. These are vague & nebulous & why don’t you & your buddies go counter them

        & Good one mate, because I have been there.

  • jellygoose@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    The EU seems to be the only entity left with a backbone when it comes protecting consumers.

    • Magnus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      They are pushing but sadly that fine is only %0.1 of each companies annual revenue for that year alone. They can go as high as 10%.

      So yes they are making headway but they are far from restoring some level of sanity between big corporations and society at large.

      • themurphy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        It goes up if they dont comply. This is first offence since the law came into effect.

  • 🌶️ - knighthawk@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    except only loosing 568m is just “the price of doing business” for them and it’s not much of a deterrent to make them stop. they made more than that by doing this so it’s still a net profit

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      I mean that would imply they stood to gain $568M by not allowing 3rd party app stores. Seems unlikely.

        • Ulrich@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          How much money do you think Google loses to 3rd party app stores? Considering they’ve been allowed from the beginning and are also one of the most profitable companies in the world?

          • chingadera@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Companies don’t do shit that costs them money for no reason.

            There are only two reasons a for profit company would do something, for profit or because the law is making them.

            • Ulrich@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Well I think it’s fair to assume that they not only didn’t know for certain that they would be charged/fined but also how long it would take for that to happen or how much it would be. And they rolled the dice. They’re definitely greedy but they’re not omnipotent.

              • chingadera@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                Likely. I guess I should clear up what I’m trying to get at, companies that large and monopolistic spend immense amount of resources doing everything they can to stifle competition because it’s profitable to do so. They made the move knowingly approaching if not downright crossing the line, because their analysis showed them it would turn out to be profitable. Will we be fined? Probably not. If we do, can we afford it and still turn a profit?

    • lud@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 months ago

      Well, half a billion is still a lot of money so it’s great that the union got it so they can spend it on something useful. Half a billion USD is the entire yearly revenue of some fairly large companies in Sweden.

      And the fine is not intended to bankrupt Apple, it’s intended to punish them and as a show of force. If Apple still refuses to comply or even pay the fine, the fines would obviously escalate and the max fine on this offence is very very high.

      Also remember that the EU generally only cares what they do inside the EU, they care about how it affects EU citizens. So it doesn’t make a whole lot of sense to issue brutally high fines based on yearly global revenue yet.

    • namingthingsiseasy@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      I didn’t read the article, but I presume this is under the DMA which has provisions for increasing fines for repeat offenses - something like 10% of global revenue or something like that. I’m also a bit discouraged by how small the number is, but there is still some hope that it will either increase or get them to change their practices. But it is quite frustrating how slowly it’s going.

      In fact, chances are that Apple is going breaking the law until the last minute so they can squeeze every penny they can out of this scheme until they can’t do it any longer.

  • Don_alForno@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Imagine if Microsoft banned Windows users from installing the software they want on their computer.

    Imagine if Microsoft required all software developers to give them 30% of their earning or Microsoft will ban them from Windows

    I think that’s exactly what Microsoft is aiming to do in the future.

      • dzsimbo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        Naw, you’re right. There are still ways to get a decent windows experience, but it will fall to the domain of power users.

        I personally see MS not really caring about their windows users. With more than enough revenue from enterprise to keep them going for decades, they will lose grip on gamers and older casual users, who remember windows before the marketplace and preinstalled adware.

        With all the flavors of Linux (and a proper walled garden like Apple), I’m thinking Windows will follow Skype in the next decade or so.

          • dzsimbo@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Only being used because someone is paying you to do it, then snuffed out after an extended death throe.

      • Romkslrqusz@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Getting out of S mode is a few clicks away though. There’s a certain kind of user who actually benefits from it, and nobody is locked in.

        RT’s restrictions were primarily architecture based (ARM)

  • Magnus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    The fine represents %0.1 of Apple’s annual revenue for 2024. That’s right. That’s how little the fine is in the grand scheme of things. And they are STILL mad.

    Also, the EU can go as high as 10%.

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      20% for repeat offenders.

      Historically EU fines are bad at stopping companies from trying shit, but they are good at stopping the behaviour. The money, btw, doesn’t go towards the EU’s budget it goes towards the member states’ contributions, everyone gets a rebate.