• Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    95
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    How is he being blackmailed by TWO superpowers? China and Russia both have his balls.

    What a loser.

    • torrentialgrain@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      73
      ·
      3 days ago

      The far right is using TikTok to reach young demographics. Banning it directly contradicts his interests.

      • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yeah, all of the “vibes are off” jokes aside, TikTok is drastically different after the ban was lifted. I have gotten straight up racist and fascist propaganda on my fyp, and there are a lot of sympathetic comments on those videos. But I never got those videos before, because my algorithm was automatically filtering them out. It’s almost as if the app has been programmed to bypass the algorithm and occasionally show alt-right talking points to everyone, just in the hopes of casting as wide a net as possible.

        • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 days ago

          I’ve had that experience on all social media platforms. Sometimes just straight up hard right propaganda will appear on my feed and I have to block it again and again.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      3 days ago

      How is he being blackmailed by TWO superpowers?

      It’s hardly blackmail. He’s benefited immensely from the right wing turn on TikTok. They’ve got a Sword of Damacles over their heads that can drop any time the site turns against him.

      He’s extorting them.

        • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’m not sure who you’re referencing to, but I’m assuming you’re not referring to me, because I despise the IDF

  • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 days ago

    Y’all, I just got my replacement tooth, so I’m finally off my mechanical diet, and I’ve been waiting months to eat some hard shell TACOS! Some SPICY CHICKEN TACOS!

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    a.k.a. how to own a social media platform without having to buy it.

    Art of the deal.

  • Kokesh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    🌮 🌮 🌮 I guess there is no legal basis anyway for banning video upload app, just because it is Chinese. Trump is an idiot. And 🐔

    • Zak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 days ago

      There is a legal basis: congress passed a law, the president at the time signed it, TikTok sued, and the Supreme Court unanimously ruled against TikTok. That’s a legal basis by definition.

      Perhaps you mean that there is no rational basis. That’s a reasonable position you can argue for.

      • BossDj@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        In this case, someone would have to sue or otherwise intervene. But that action is radically unpopular. Nobody wants to be that guy.

  • Nougat@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    “There is no legal basis” describes everything this administration does.

  • Ech@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    PatrickStar.meme - “Is Money a legal basis?”

  • WhatsHerBucket@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Tiny Taco Hands makes up the rules as he goes along. He can extend as many times as he wants, who is going to stop him?

  • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    The legal basis is someone with standing would have to sue him over it. Tiktokm certainly isn’t going to and Congress… Well.

    • kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Maybe Elmo could, now that they broke up. He could argue that TikTok existing makes Twitter’s videos less popular.

      • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Hard to have standing over a third party not doing something to someone else that would hurt them to maybe(key point here) help you. It’s possible to argue yourself there but the bar is incredibly high. If you can’t assign direct provable causation and redress, you’re SOL.

        It’s kind of like how nobody really could challenge DACA in the courts from the Republican side because all the harms they cited were hypothetical.