• Wispy2891@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    5 days ago

    Coretemp and Ethernet. Also a few years ago the guy that maintained meshcentral (the only reason to pay extra $$$ for having Intel vPro compatibile computers in the workspace)

    Basically this tells their biggest customers “next server needs to be based on AMD epyc”

    How much money they could possibly “save” with those THREE salaries? Just cut one week of travel with private jet for the C class and the same savings are served

    • Cocopanda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      5 days ago

      But how else is the CEO going to cheat on his wife? Cold play concerts are def out of the picture now.

  • Fedditor385@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    6 days ago

    So, their chips become unsuitable for enterprise servers. Datacenters avoiding them and buying AMD. Intel losing enterprise market share and revenue. Reduced revenue causes next layoffs, probably again people working on things that keep the business working. Shoots itself in the foot and being surprised about the consequences.

  • Jesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    ·
    6 days ago

    IMO, Intel is circling the drain and will die without intervention. And their death will have some pretty crazy ramifications.

    If the US had competent leaders, they’d realize Intel was important to global security, and they’d come up with some sort of way to break up the fab and design business.

    No one wants to send their designs to Intel’s fab because they don’t want Intel to copy their homework. That’s why Intel’s design competitors use TSMC. And TSMC scales faster because of increased money and experience.

    • floofloof@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      6 days ago

      Trump’s 100% tariffs on chips made outside the USA is puzzling. It it an attempt to force Intel, who do make chips in the USA, to become more competitive just through bullying everyone? Or does he know it will just cause more trouble and is he trying to drive Intel into the ground for revenge because they took Biden’s money? Why is he also demanding that Intel’s CEO resign? Does none of it make sense because Trump is a crazy old narcissist who has lost touch with reality and is now losing his mind?

        • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          6 days ago

          Point 3 of Umberto Eco’s traits of ur-fascism.

          Irrationalism also depends on the cult of action for action’s sake. Action being beautiful in itself, it must be taken before, or without, any previous reflection. Thinking is a form of emasculation. Therefore culture is suspect insofar as it is identified with critical attitudes. Distrust of the intellectual world has always been a symptom of Ur-Fascism, from Goering’s alleged statement (“When I hear talk of culture I reach for my gun”) to the frequent use of such expressions as “degenerate intellectuals,” “eggheads,” “effete snobs,” “universities are a nest of reds.” The official Fascist intellectuals were mainly engaged in attacking modern culture and the liberal intelligentsia for having betrayed traditional values.

      • Jesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 days ago

        The tariff thing just shows that Trump doesn’t understand why people use TSMC. TSMC doesn’t have a brand of chips that they sell, and they can’t copy your designs.

        Companies don’t manufacture with Intel because Intel isn’t just their manufacturer, it’s their competitor. Also, Intel’s fab is now behind the curve. It literally can’t manufacture some of the shit Apple and Nvidia want.

        Trump sees a rash and is prescribing cortisone cream. But the skin irritation is from melanoma.

    • AngryPancake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 days ago

      There’s no way politicians will let one of the most important chip manufacturers die. If push comes to shove, they’ll get subsidies

  • magnetosphere@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    6 days ago

    Mostly nontechnical person here: how much active maintenance does this driver need? To the uninitiated, it sounds like it should be basic and standard.

    • potatopotato@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      6 days ago

      Not much, but it does need to be maintained. Every time someone pushes an update to code that the driver uses, something changes in the Linux kernel, or Intel releases be hardware that needs a different register map or whatever, the driver will fail. If nobody steps up to maintain it, it could stop working in a matter of months.

      • Mniot@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        Their “real” job was some standard cog-in-the-machine engineering work, which is why they got laid off. Just another number.

        Most open-source work happens outside of corporate planning and so it’s invisible to the company. When the reality is, it would absolutely be worth it to Intel to pay a 40/w salary just to maintain this little bit of code. The value is there, but the humans running the company would never be able to get over the hurdle of “he’s not working very hard so he doesn’t deserve the money.”

  • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Without Intel processors, Linux wouldn’t have been possible in the first place.

    But today we have good processors from many different manufacturers. The Linux community must, and can, stay alive even without the support of one major player.

    • Mihies@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      6 days ago

      We don’t have that many other processors, though. If you look at the desktop, there is AMD and there is Apple silicon which is restricted to Apple products. And then there is nothing. If Intel goes under ground, AMD might become next Intel. It’s time (for EU) to invest heavily into RISC-V, the entire stack.

        • Mihies@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          ARMs are more oriented towards servers and mobile devices for now. Sure, we saw Apple demonstrating desktop use but not much is there for desktops for now. RISC-V is far away, Chinese CPUs are not competitive. It’s coming doesn’t help in short term, questionable in mid term. 🤷‍♂️ Yes, alternatives will come eventually, but it takes a lot of time and resources.

      • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        If you look at the desktop, there is AMD and there is Apple silicon

        You can get workstations with Ampere Altra CPUs that use an ARM ISA. It’s not significant in the market, more of a server CPU put in a desktop for developers, but it provides a starting point, from which you could cut down the core count and try to boost the clocks.

        There is also the Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus with some laptops on the market from mainstream brands already (Asus Zenbook A14, Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6, Dell Inspiron 5441). That conversely could probably scale up to a desktop design fairly quickly.

        You’re right that we’re not there, but I don’t think we’re that far off either. If Intel keeled over there would be a race to fill the gap and they wouldn’t leave the market to AMD alone.

  • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    6 days ago

    So just stick with what I’ve been doing and avoid Intel? Got it.