And thanks to Trump, the US is perfectly placed to be entirely left behind.
This moron doesn’t understand that green energy was a new sector where US could dominate for decades.
A lot of countries are forced to import fossil fuels as they can’t produce their own so replacing that with local alternatives actually increases national security.
Do people think China went into renewable energy because suddenly Xi became a tree hugger?
From what I’ve gleaned of the ravings of the angry stupid right blogosphere, a lot of people actually do think that only tree huggers want green energy.
And I have little doubt that that’s an opinion that Trump shares, but that’s not his main motivation in all of this. His main motivation is big fat bribes from the fossil fuel industry.
He’s not in a position to know (much, including) how many investors have put their money on green. A few months to put up a low/no-waste solar or windmill farm (he hates how they look) and start profiting … 10 years (at least) to build a high-waste nuke (and decades of paying interest on those expensive long-term loans)
It’s the moment Sears let Amazon take the lead on mail order shopping just because Sears didn’t understand how the internet and shopping could work together.
Not only the US , Germany is also far behind
Don’t get my hopes up
More behind than an anal orgy.
China’s electrification efforts are substantial and to be applauded and encouraged.
The problem is when you tell one sided stories, the important details get lost.
This is the most recent figure on China’s total energy mix from the IEA. They have a stupid long way to go on emissions.
It sounds nice to say they installed more solar in a month that australia has ever in it’s history. Let’s look at the trends…
Coal is up. Way up. Why did this article lose the narrative so badly? Because it’s a fluff piece, not an informed, intelligent discussion on emissions.
What’s the source of these graphs? I’ve seen them used before for a different country and they look really cool. I could probably waste a few hours just browsing different countries
https://www.iea.org/countries/china/energy-mix
You can look at any country.
Is there data for 2024 yet?
Not that I saw. See another post below with the iea website.
not until we actually stop using fossil fuels. we are still using more fossil fuels than ever. And when/if renewables actually start eating into the fossil fuel market, then fossil fuels will get cheaper. So either we are going to burn through most of our fossil fuels regardless, or we will eventually need to take some kind of punitive actions against using them.
anyway, you’d think republicans would be on board with renewables for exactly the same reasons as china. it makes economic and national security sense if that’s all you care about.
anyway, you’d think republicans would be on board with renewables for exactly the same reasons as china. it makes economic and national security sense if that’s all you care about.
Not for them, and not for the horizon they care about. They’re (and the US as a whole) heavily invested in fossil fuels, so economically for them it makes the most sense to squeeze as much profit from those investments as possible.
Fund Ukraine to bomb Russian refineries. Huge win for the environment
Incorrect. Why are you speaking in an authoritative voice when you aren’t knowledgeable about the topic?
Percentage of fossil fuels is down -
https://www.worldenergydata.org/wp-content/uploads/11-US-elec-fuel-share-trends.svg
And the absolute amount of fossil fuels is down -
https://www.worldenergydata.org/wp-content/uploads/10-US-elec-fuel-qty-1.svg
Source -
https://www.worldenergydata.org/national-energy-trends/trends-of-united-states-energy-system/
Man, they’re twisting the data hard to try to make China look good here. They’re falling back on per capita, and cumulative to try to hide that they’re the largest emitter of carbon by far, much of it is from burning coal, which they are still doing much more than any other country.
This is greenwashing, nothing more.
If you observe snapshots in time you’d understand what the facts are at that point in time. If you observe the trends at a point in time, you’d understand what things are likely to look at a future point in time. To me the interesting and informative bit is the trend and its short and long term projections. E.g. that it points to peak oil consumption within a couple of years and that it points to reduction of the leverage of OPEC and the US over China along any downstream effects.
Oh come on! Cheetolini knows best that fossil fuels are the future. All this woke green energy talk.
~I’m case I have to spell it out, I’m being sarcastic.~
Jeff Daniels was right in Looper. “Go to china!”
