Non-fissile material goes in, nuclear power comes out. Can’t explain that.

Hell, some of the more modern designs barely produce that…

AI header image; dr

I’m right there with you when that kind of clickbaiting crops up, but this article actually isn’t doing that; they’re actually quoting the researchers:

[Manganese]-based passivation is a counter-intuitive discovery, which cannot be explained by current knowledge in corrosion science.

This seems like a genuinely novel discovery.

Agreed. It’s a really creative story.

Look at this fancy motherfucker with his fancy motherfucking headphone jack…

You use an LLM to write this?

I care about the sentiment, not the points.

Nah, what’s sadder is getting ratioed like this for being an AI shill.

Individual LEDs, yes; the rectifiers in most LED “bulbs” shouldn’t care.

“Privatize the profits…”

Thanks, Handsome Jack.

inset

Pro tip: if you’re trying to sound smarter than someone, make sure you know what the words you’re using mean.

…to the surprise of no one with a brain.

Some quotation marks would do your title a lot of favors.

Okay, so on further research it looks like the vulnerabilities were all part of that library, and not inherent to the protocol itself.

I haven’t been following Matrix development too closely, but last I heard, both the protocol and the reference implementation had serious flaws, including gaping security holes. As in, issues that couldn’t be overcome without a clean-slate redesign. Did they somehow manage to salvage something useable?

This, but unironically.

If the word is understandable, screw the spelling. Descriptivists rise up!

Even US houses above a certain age have the same problem.

It’s the sound of a joke going over your head.