

Good to know, youtube algorithm sent it to me and felt the video was pretty good, first time I have heard of this person


Good to know, youtube algorithm sent it to me and felt the video was pretty good, first time I have heard of this person


Hmm I think aws outages would not be an issue if a local LLM or a self hosted one was used, this seems like the kind of thing that lends itself well to this actually for once.
I don’t think image generation is remotely useful in this format because I think it would be best used to just fetch things in a way that is like a universal fuzzy search.
I think the quality of the summaries and citations found are more to do with prompt skill than the ai itself, like for example we can look at how my original post caused so many people to have a visceral negative reaction where it was unwarranted just because it was not to their liking, but the content itself is actually somewhat reasonable.
I think nobody will settle on what agi actually is so I consider this not worth thinking about if the topic is restricted just to workflow things.
Something I just realized is that this can be used on android with little to no adjustment and it could even use apps to varying degrees


Thats OK we all get buzzed with buzz words haha.
There is one thing that I am curious about though, do you think you’d use the thing in the original post?
Wanting to know if the utility has landed for at least one person.


Oh I consider it quite well usually, just I didn’t care to do it this time because I figured it is reasonable for people to click the 2 links to figure out what this is if for some reason the title wasn’t enough and then they could read the rest if they wanted to but I guess this is too much to ask of people nowadays since we are too used to only reading things that are nice.
This was not an issue with other communities I have shared this with so I have to believe that the Lemmy community is just built different I guess.
There was nothing emotionally charged about the original post it was just thinking out loud.
Thankyou for actually being somewhat reasonable


I figured the 3rd paragraph does that but it is a fair criticism that it isnt the first paragraph.
I have it sort of reversed from normal where I have links and reasonigns first rather than after stating the premise.


Man I wish I was an LLM in this case, it is pretty lame to get spat on for sharing something I found interesting and useful to other people who I know would find this interesting and useful. The incoherence of the post is just rambling without wording things nicely


Clearly at least the people who made it give a rats ass about this lol


Sorry it is not worded to be nice to read it is just me rambling.


Is this not using normal terminal commands?


It turns the useful parts of ai into normal boring computer scripting so it can be used more effectively as an agentic helper without the overhead of usual software tools.
The use case I laid out was basically a way to avoid getting algorithmically addicted and being able to use it broadly across multiple platforms which is a problem that is basically not solved rn unless you just don’t use some parts of social media.
But you can also use it for various other mouse and keyboard tasks to save some time for yourself that aren’t dependent on personal input like say checking some logs or reminders or organization tasks, so basically agentic bounded boring disposable task autocomplete for the people who don’t like ai being shoved into their personal thinking workflows.
Glad I’m not the only one who as considering this, kid net sounds awesome.
Here’s another thing I found awhile back thst seemed inline with that to some degree.


Dayum that’s rough


Yep which is why the purpose of this post


It seems to have to do with how it looks formatting wise and not about availability or not, that is what is being meant.


Not enough dodge too much RAM 👌


How so lol?
I think they are saying add chatgpt in because if everyone adopts it outside and then they cant do it on the test then the test now does not effectively tell how the person is able to think to solutions because the test itself is “out of spec” of the typical person needing to do the things on the test.
Its like when calculators were allowed then disallowed then allowed again and now we can’t go without them a lot of the time while everyone now does more complex math and gets into higher level data sooner as a result of technological adoption.
The nature of the tests and teaching/learning now must change since we are looking at people who can do the combo of themselves plus chatgpt.