

Well, there is a wavelength that by itself activates both of these cones such that we interpret it as yellow. But a combination of wavelengths also does that


Well, there is a wavelength that by itself activates both of these cones such that we interpret it as yellow. But a combination of wavelengths also does that


What I meant is that if you have a photo of a yellow flower, I’d would say that the file contains “yellow color”, even though it only uses RGB values. The display is “transmitting yellow into your brain” by emitting a combination of wavelengths. Wavelength that normally represents color yellow is not emitted, but the “color yellow” is sent, in a way


IMO saying that yellow doesn’t exist during the entire process is going a bit far. It exists as a combination of the other values. Or no colors exist during the process, as it’s all just ones and zeroes and then wavelengths, which only get turn into colors in your brain. Depending on how you want to look at it


Why are you at my home???


Theseus of Theseus


I’m not an expert, but LLMs should still be deterministic. If you run the model with 0 creativity (or whatever the randomness setting is called) and provide exactly the same input, it should provide the same output. That’s not how it’s usually configured, but it should be possible. Now, if you change the input at all (change order of movies, misspell a title, etc) then the output can change in an unpredictable way


Have they actually used it anywhere or just have the patent? Because I expect they won’t actually use it anywhere, like with Sony’s (IIRC) patent where you have to shout “McDonald’s!” after watching an ad. Though I wouldn’t be too surprised if they actually use it


Support your local businesses!
If on average a PC gamer build a PC every 5 years (which, IMO, is enough), then roughly 60% will have a PC new enough that they won’t plan to build one in the next two years