Naive and factually incorrect. What a combo. There are clear exceptions for dual-use targets under the Geneva convention, such as a logistics warehouse being used to supply the military with their equipment. There is also a commonly accepted concept of “reciprocal force” or “self-defense” in pretty much any reasonable moral code in this world. No one expects people to just keep getting punched in the face and sit there quietly without responding in kind. This type of attack would definitely qualify considering what Russia has been doing to Ukraine for the last 4-years.

Ukraine is at least trying to follow international law and be as good faith of an actor as they can in war time. Russia has lit the Geneva convention on fire and pissed in all of our faces for more than a decade, but sure, they are equally abhorrent parties in your eyes. Get a grip and learn some nuance. The world is complex and full of gray area. Don’t be such a simpleton.

They literally address it in the article. Military hardware and drone components were readily available on the website even after the attacks. What else do you want to see?

Besides, it’s not like Russia has given a shit about war crimes since they invaded. They commit them daily. Acting like Ukraine should be following the rules that Russia has torn to shreds for 4-years is…idiotic.

Not sure if your posts are bad faith/intentional misdirection or simple stupidity. Either way, it’s not a good look for you. Do better.