• reddifuge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Ai has a proven track record of causing less accidents, and killing far fewer animals per km traveled than the average driver.

    92% fewer accidents involving animals than the average human.

    Ai doesn’t drink, get distracted, or smoke meth like the ml mods.

    • sobchak@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I believe these cars drive on the same roads all day, whereas people are likely to be driving in and out of areas these systems are not familiar with. I suppose a good comparison would be of a taxi driver that only operates in the same area as the driverless cars, if that exists.

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 month ago

      here you dropped this

      per capita

      your figures (though I doubt them) don’t include the skew of driver vs driverless vehicles. of course driverless cars are 92% less likely to have an accident involving animals. that’s because driverless cars account for less than 1% of the entire vehicle population.

      Ai doesn’t drink, get distracted, or smoke meth like the ml mods.

      but it does randomly hallucinate.

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      And have a nice habit of being turned off before the accident so the AI didn’t cause the accident. Numbers are bullshit.