• Bilb!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    For what it’s worth, I’ve been working on (yet another) ActivityPub based micro blogging application and LLMs have been enormously helpful and so far as I can tell, correct. Often it cites the AP specs and its extensions, as well as specific implementations from existing major AP apps. It can show me expected outputs, what responses from my app should look like in response to different requests from other servers, and quickly give context for features like Mastodon’s shared inbox. I’m not having it simply generate code, but I think I’m still moving way faster than I otherwise could. I don’t recall it ever giving me incorrect information.

    It’s the first time I’ve used an LLM as a tool this way, and I’m pretty impressed with it. I’m using the assistant made available through Kagi.

    • MangoCats@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Often it cites the AP specs and its extensions

      Tip: check those citations yourself before publishing with your name on the product. Yeah, they’re usually correct - do you only usually not want to be perceived as a lazy idiot?