• Proton VPN has hit back at Canada’s proposed Bill C-22

• The proposed legislation could require VPNs to log user metadata

• NordVPN and Windscribe have also slammed the bill

  • XLE@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Being backed by the law also means working within the confinements of the law.

    They don’t say that, now do they?

    • Photonic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Why would they have to?

      Do they really have to specify when they cite the law that that the law works for them exactly like it does for everyone else?

      They never say they are above the law or will break the law either. Now that would be false advertising.

      • XLE@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Their advertising is already false advertising, Photonic. Stop making up strawman scenarios to defend the dishonest corporation.

      • XLE@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Why would they have to?

        Proton is a privacy service. If the best thing you can say about its deception is that they aren’t violating the law, you have a very low bar.

    • Photonic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      And you had to remove your comment here…. Did it prove you wrong? Is that why you removed it?How disingenuous of you.

      Yet you still can’t find a comment where I said anything even remotely disingenuous towards you.

      Guess that was just your daddy Trump’s rhetoric again…