hamburgheftig@feddit.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoFed up with vibe coders, dev sneaks data-nuking prompt injection into their code - Ars Technicaarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square156linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10cross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.sepulse_of_truth@infosec.pub
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkFed up with vibe coders, dev sneaks data-nuking prompt injection into their code - Ars Technicaarstechnica.comhamburgheftig@feddit.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square156linkfedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.sepulse_of_truth@infosec.pub
minus-squareJakeroxs@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agoYes it can, its literally still code.
minus-squaremabeledo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agoI know it’s code. You are missing the point. Any library with a critical user mass is auditable, because a fraction of those users would take the time to do so, whereas all LLM generated variations of the same library cannot and will never be auditable.
minus-squareJakeroxs@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agoThat’s literally not what you said, you said “LLM code can not be auditable” which is demonstrably wrong. Go ahead and move the goal posts though.
minus-squaremabeledo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agoYou missed the context. I don’t blame you.
Yes it can, its literally still code.
I know it’s code. You are missing the point.
Any library with a critical user mass is auditable, because a fraction of those users would take the time to do so, whereas all LLM generated variations of the same library cannot and will never be auditable.
That’s literally not what you said, you said “LLM code can not be auditable” which is demonstrably wrong.
Go ahead and move the goal posts though.
You missed the context. I don’t blame you.