• Triumph@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    That’s a lawsuit waiting to happen. People bought a license to use a product, with the reasonable expectation that said license would be both perpetual and unchanging.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 days ago

        While generally true, sometimes it is about the principle of it, and the only way it makes sense to address it is through class action.

        If I join in on a class action suit, it’s more about making the company pay (and hopefully changing their, and others’, policy to avoid future lawsuits), than getting a check for $8.25 in the mail 3 years down the line.

        • Footer1998@crazypeople.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          18 days ago

          ok but you recognize they wont change their policy right? they will profit more from their shitty anticonsumer policies than they’ll ever pay through class actions, may as well go full luigi if it’s about making executives pay consequences for their actions

          the only way forward is organizing, nothing else will be effective

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            18 days ago

            ok but you recognize they wont change their policy right?

            Except that, historically, there are countless examples of class action suit resulting in large and impactful changes to entire industries.

            These sites lists a few, but you can search yourself:

            https://www.iveyengineering.com/class-action-lawsuits-2/

            https://zlk.com/learn/notable-class-action-lawsuit-examples#largest-and-most-notable-class-action-lawsuits-4

            https://classactionbuddy.com/blog/famous-class-action-lawsuits-that-changed-history/

            (The URL for this one does suggest that there might be some bias, however I’m pretty sure the cases listed are all real)

            It’s not perfect, and probably not even close to the best way to do this kind of thing… But it can work

            • Footer1998@crazypeople.online
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              18 days ago

              god these are some depressing links, first one includes roe v. wade, third one is a list of corporations doing terrible shit and those corporations are pretty much all doing the exact same shit.

              this is all pure cope mate

              • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                18 days ago

                Why do you think Roe v Wade is a bad example? It made abortion legal for like 50 years.

                Sure bud, just ignore:

                Brown v. The Board of Education that resulted in the desegregation of all public schools in the US.

                The “Scopes Monkey Trial” is why US public schools are even allowed to teach evolution.

                Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement which resulted in outlawing advertising tobacco products on billboards and during sporting events, and brought in over $200 billion to states for medical expenses related to smoking.

                Both the Enron and WorldCom suits led directly to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

                The Agent Orange suit by Vietnam vets that led directly to the Agent Orange Act of 1991.

                Etc.

                It seems like you think I believe that this is the best and only way for things to change, which is literally the exact opposite of what I said.

                • Footer1998@crazypeople.online
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  18 days ago

                  because it was rolled back? so it’s obviously not an effective form of long term change?

                  i’m over this argument, believe whatever you want, i dont care

          • obvs@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            18 days ago

            may as well go full luigi

            Wait, you’re telling me that’s an option that people could choose?

            I wonder what the world would be like if a whole bunch of people started doing that. Could you imagine?

            • Footer1998@crazypeople.online
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              18 days ago

              adventurism is not an effective method for long term change, we need to organize and work together, doing random acts of violence doesn’t really move the needle

    • BananaTrifleViolin@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      Yeah, Microsoft is gambling that the number of users who care enough to act are too small, or won’t bother, or won’t realise they can.

      This is how big corporations get away with this shit. It’s not “illegal” in the criminal sense, but it is a breach of contract between Microsoft and those affected; and they likely could win against Microsoft.

      The good news is the outrage over this is probably more damaging than any settlement or long drawn out legal case even would be. It’s at just the right time as Microsoft deals with major issues and unhappiness with Windows users over poor updates, crappy feature changes to Win 11 and of course force feeding of CoPilot down every users throat, while also decimating their own staff to save money for AI and polluting their own products codebases with shitty AI generated slop. Perfect storm has hit Microsoft, and they don’t even realise how bad it is yet.

        • thejml@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          19 days ago

          As an Apple user, I laughed at this… the one thing we all want is NOT to have Gemini or AI on our phones. I mean, if we wanted Gemini, we could just use Google & Android.

      • binux@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 days ago

        It’s crazy how once these companies get big enough, they become a cancer that just slowly self-destructs. Everything that’s going wrong in their business can be blamed solely on them. Just all around gross incompetence in the most absurd, blatant way possible. I really hope that, in the near future, we see the main opinion of Microsoft finally coming around to understanding this redundant company’s pig-brained, slop-obsessed stupidity.

    • hydrashok@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      Yeah. I could see them deprecating O365 hooks and services or something, but the entire suite? That’s bullshit.

    • Don_alForno@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      “But it doesn’t have that one function that predicts the circumference of an ant’s hind segment based on the diameter of breadcrumbs it carries! I use that every day for vital work!”

  • mecen@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    They even edited information about support, it was meant to work but they edited it to your files will be safe and openable in word 365 app

  • obvs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    I switched to OpenOffice.org(now LibreOffice) when Microsoft replaced menus with ribbons.

    And I switched from Google to DuckDuckGo after being a Google user from nearly the very beginning, because they tried to claim earlier this week that they couldn’t prove I was over 18 years old unless I provided them my legal identification.

    Thanks Google, I can’t imagine how the fact that I’ve physically been using your product and logging into the account for more than 20 years would leave any question in your mind that I’m over 18 years old, but you do you.

    No regrets with LibreOffice. None.

    • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      I bitched and moaned when office 2007 came out. Stupid ribbons. Still hate that shit. Only thing MS office has going for it, that I haven’t found elsewhere, is collaboration and Danish grammar check. I haven’t found proper grammar check in my native Danish yet, outside of ms office that is. But if my job decided to ditch its pricey office subscriptions, I’d be cheeringly installing libreoffice.

      I do hope I get a chance to retrieve all my emails when I get shut out for raising an arthritic middle finger and telling Google to go fuck themselves when asked for ID. I got my gmail account when people still paid for invites. How can I be underage? I wasn’t even underage then.

      • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 days ago

        I do hope I get a chance to retrieve all my emails when I get shut out for raising an arthritic middle finger and telling Google to go fuck themselves when asked for ID.

        Just going to remind you, because I appreciated when someone reminded me: The best time to run a ‘Google Checkout’ to get a backup is now.

    • betanumerus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      Fine unless the company you work for uses MS Office and you have to bring work home. In that case, the seamless compatibility is difficult to bypass.

      • Toes♀@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 days ago

        Any organization that expects you to use your personal IT equipment for work is likely in violation of several privacy laws and incompetent.

        • betanumerus@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          18 days ago

          You remind me of the time I wanted to complain about noise while I was the only guy able to do anything to reduce noise.

  • IHeartBadCode@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    I distinctly remember the conversations about Office’s phone home system and people specifically saying “this seems problematic” and Microsoft hand waving those concerns away.

    • adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      it’s not the ‘phoning home’ that’s doing this. they built-in a time bomb by way of an expiring digital certificate. one that won’t get updated or replaced because the software versions in question are ‘out of support’.

      • Bloefz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 days ago

        Well it kinda is because that certificate is needed for the phoning home. If it didn’t need to communicate at all it wouldn’t have needed an SSL certificate so there would have been nothing to expire.

  • horse@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    19 days ago

    Yay, that’ll be a fun day at work… I’m in charge of administering our fleet of Macs and all the users use MS Office heavily. We are currently not allowed to provide access to Office 365 for data protection reasons, so if they brick the volume license we are currently using I won’t have a viable solution for them, beyond switching to OWA/Apple Mail and some other office suite.

    The writing’s been on the wall for a while though. They recently made it so that you can’t hide the Office 365 nag screen while using a volume license, which confuses users into thinking they don’t have a license. I fucking hate Microslop.

    Edit: As far as I can tell this will only affect users using a 2019 volume license (which is already not compatible with current versions), but the 2021 license will continue to work? (Source: https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/update-microsoft-365-or-office-on-your-macos-or-ios-device-f418ae5d-bb5f-4078-b3d9-9340f5dd084e ). I’d definitely be interested if anyone has more information. In any case, I’m sure it’s just a matter of time until they fuck everyone not using a subscription based license for any of their products.

    • GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      Edit 2: Nevermind. 13th October is the day Microslop has chosen to fuck me: https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/system-requirements/end-of-support-for-office-2021

      You’ll still get a few years before the software becomes remotely disabled, though. This story about Office 2019 losing functionality follows Office 2019 losing support in 2023. If that’s the rate things go, then maybe Office 2021 will lose functionality either 2 years from now (7 years after release) or 3 years from now (3 years after losing support).

      • horse@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 days ago

        True, but running EOL software that doesn’t receive updates to known vulnerabilities isn’t really an option.

        • GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          18 days ago

          Yeah, but that’s always been true of paid software licenses for a particular version: it reaches EOL and you have to decide whether to live with the possibility of unpatched known vulnerabilities or pay for an upgrade to a more recent release.

          MS Office has been doing this from back in the Windows 3.0 days at least.