• NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    30 days ago

    That would have been AutoPilot 6 years ago.

    AP back then had radar, but radar cant reliably detect a stationary object at high speeds. Every OEMs traffic aware cruise control had this weakness if its radar based back then. They typically warn you about it before first use, which is part of why you must pay attention.

    Only vision or lidar can address an issue like this, and cars weren’t really shipping with lidar back then.

    Newer Teslas with HW4 and FSD would handle this better. HW3 and FSD might not reliably handle it, but its hard to say.

    Edit: and even today on HW4 car, AP would probably fail here like this story. Its just not meant for this and is very very old at this point.

    • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      30 days ago

      The point was to illustrate the failure of the visual system from way back then. And considering the price point of Teslas, the fact they still don’t have lidar today is criminal.

      • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        30 days ago

        The point is that no consumer system on the road back then would have reliably prevented that incident, and it is better today.

        Edit: to clarify, youre trying to say it isnt even basic because back then it failed at something everything would have failed at.

        • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          30 days ago

          it failed at something everything would have failed at.

          Lidar first started getting deployed commercially in cars in 2017.

          it is better today.

          Teslas are still using the same sensors today that they were back then.

      • Null User Object@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        30 days ago

        the fact they still don’t have lidar today is criminal.

        That would require the muskrat to experience a moment of self reflection and admit he was wrong about something.

    • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      30 days ago

      Yes, radar was found to be useless at highway speeds for stationary objects because if it responded to such events, you get sudden, emergency “ghost braking.” Radar is so low resolution, it cannot tell the difference between the back of a tractor trailer and a large sign or overpass.