sanitation@lemmy.today to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 12 days agoNvidia’s CEO Jensen Huang says electricians and plumbers will be needed by the hundreds of thousands in the new working worldfortune.comexternal-linkmessage-square95linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkNvidia’s CEO Jensen Huang says electricians and plumbers will be needed by the hundreds of thousands in the new working worldfortune.comsanitation@lemmy.today to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 12 days agomessage-square95linkfedilink
minus-square🌸𝓯𝓵𝓸𝔀𝓮𝓻🌸@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·11 days agoYou don’t want to replace them as that has legal issues. But an AI being backseat driver and evaluating their decisions and check what the consequences would be to report that to investors is also very useful.
minus-squareshrugs@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·11 days agoDon’t antropomorphize AI! An AI doesn’t evaluate anything, an AI doesn’t check for consequences. All AI does is predicting the next word. Do I take the car to the carwash or do i walk? If it’s only 300m away, you should walk Sure, now predict the future please *facepalm*
minus-squareboonhet@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·11 days agoThe carwash thing applies to low end models and older models. Here’s Claude from lowest to highest model, ignoring the banned Fable
minus-squarereplicat@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·11 days agoThey altered the training data to address this challenge. The underlying issue wasn’t solved in any way. Don’t be naive.
minus-squareboonhet@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·11 days agoTakes months to train a model, there were already models that got it right when the question was popular, as long as thinking was enabled. Also if they were optimising for this question, why not update their lower end model (Haiku) as well? The interesting question would be what percent of humans get it wrong. Smaller than LLMs for sure, but I somehow doubt it’s 0.
You don’t want to replace them as that has legal issues. But an AI being backseat driver and evaluating their decisions and check what the consequences would be to report that to investors is also very useful.
Don’t antropomorphize AI!
An AI doesn’t evaluate anything, an AI doesn’t check for consequences. All AI does is predicting the next word.
Do I take the car to the carwash or do i walk?
Sure, now predict the future please *facepalm*
The carwash thing applies to low end models and older models. Here’s Claude from lowest to highest model, ignoring the banned Fable
They altered the training data to address this challenge. The underlying issue wasn’t solved in any way. Don’t be naive.
Takes months to train a model, there were already models that got it right when the question was popular, as long as thinking was enabled.
Also if they were optimising for this question, why not update their lower end model (Haiku) as well?
The interesting question would be what percent of humans get it wrong. Smaller than LLMs for sure, but I somehow doubt it’s 0.