• Aganim@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      Founded by Nazis, but abandoned during the war and revived by British army officer Ivan Hirst whom both saw the potential for turning it into a workshop and building new vehicles for the British occupation forces.

      After the war it was used by REME (Corps of Royal Electrical and Mechanical Engineers) to repair British army vehicles, and it was used to build new vehicles. It was handed over to West Germany in september 1949.

      The company as we know it today therefore effectively has more British roots than Nazi ones.

    • anon5621@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      Holy crap I miss old times 2013 when nobody was even bothering and all bootloaders was unlocked by default no play integrity just do what u wanna do with ur own device

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          21 days ago

          The apps that didn’t work well were not due to lack of lock-in.

          The apps didn’t work well due to lack of maturity in the platform. This app is not failing because the OS is somehow ‘2013-like’, it is failing because Android app developers are going all-in on lock-in.

  • Triumph@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    Class action for unilaterally modifying the agreement about feature access after the fact and to the detriment of the consumer.

  • pimat@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    How are all these governments and companies managing to enshitify everything? Yet, when it comes to real problems like world hunger, child poverty, and exploitation, no one even blinks an eye.

    • tonyn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      The thing nobody is willing to admit is if free food and shelter for everyone becomes a thing, the population would explode. Every system in nature needs a balance. Any organism, animal, living thing, humans included, will increase in population until the limit of resources is hit. We have no natural predators so our population is limited solely by the resources we have access to. Feeding everyone would actually increase the problem of trying to feed everyone.

      • Talcosis@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 days ago

        Time is a resource, and in the modern world where near-full time parental involvement is assumed, it would effectively limit reproduction.

        Matter of fact, it is entirely possible that is a significant part of why birthrates keep declining.

    • antbricks@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      They can make safety, fuel efficiency, usability, and comfort improvements AND enshittify things too! These are complicated machines.

    • snoons@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      No one makes short term profit off of solving world hunger, so it doesn’t get solved. 🙈

    • 4am@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      I dunno if this is a rhetorical game we play with ourselves in our heads but whether it’s or it isn’t, we know exactly why they are doing it and we have for many years.

      Your car has an active cellular connection whether you pay to rent time on it or not and it transmits your location, an ID number, usage habits including driving controls, music preferences, and possibly keywords spoken while in or near the vehicle, to the manufacturer. They relay that data to the government who uses it to learn who you associate with and when and where, and they sell it to your insurance company who monitors you for risky behavior, and they also sell it to advertisers who also profile you to device what the best things to try and sell you will be.

    • lokalhorst@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      Why would they let people in who don’t want to share their data? They can’t make money out of you. So they try to force an OS on you that has spying enabled by default. And if you don’t comply, then fuck you nerd.

    • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      Infotaiment system. It integrates your audio library, your maps, contacts and other apps seamlessly. You get current traffic info, automatic updates and huge app library (for example CoMaps and many apps for public chargers). Integrated infotamiment system were left far behind years ago.

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 days ago

        You get all that through android auto. The manufacturer app is for when you’re not in the car.

        • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          22 days ago

          Oh, I thought we’re talking about android auto. If this is the specific car app it’s a different story, yes.

    • dwemthy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      So you can buy a subscription for the soft locked features like remote start. And so they get you to agree to a location tracking EULA. Got a VW this year and the dealership pushed the app really hard, apparently they have to pay VW a fee if they don’t hit a quota for sign ups.

    • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      It doesn’t need it, it will drive just fine without app connection, but it provides convenient remote access and control capabilities.

        • 17jGuFCOn89iY@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          22 days ago

          It’s the one modern feature I wouldn’t want to give up. Cooling my car down before I get in it without having to walk out to it is very nice.

        • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          22 days ago

          Well there’s always buying an old beater or a classic and restoring it. But you’d have to go more than 40 years back to find cars that are entirely without digital components.

        • YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          21 days ago

          I’m a convert for the fob systems. Despite having grown up a locksmith, I still lock my keys in my car more than I’m proud to admit. But ever since I got a newish Avalon, it hasn’t let me do it once. Plus I got tactile buttons for most all control. Ac is still touch screen type buttons, but everything else I get a reassuring click.

        • FatVegan@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          22 days ago

          My first car was a 1992 honda civic. As time went on and cars cot more modern, i yearned for a more modern car. Infotainment seemed like so much fun, all thr convenient knick knacks and gizmos.

          Now, unironocally my dream car is my 1992 honda civic from back in the day

          • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            22 days ago

            90s Civic or Miata has been my dream forever, I’m with ya.

            Two pieces of modern tech, though: security and sound.

            90s Civics were notoriously easy to steal, so I’d definitely want something to prevent that.

            When I was younger, I’d always dreamed of having a nice sound system in my car, but could never afford to do it. Now that I have a car with a super nice sound system and a sub, I can never go back. No “infotainment” BS tho, just gimme a standard deck. USB support is nice, but an aux jack is all I really need.

            • FatVegan@leminal.space
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              22 days ago

              In my civic i installed a “killswitch”, which was just a hidden switch to turn on the fuel pump. Not really sure how much that would prevent theft in the real world, but i think it was hard enough to find that someone trying to steal the car would rather give up than spending more time on this car. I had a pretty good sound system, which i wouldn’t need anymore. Infotainment is super overrated, my dream setup now is just something that mirrors my phone

              • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                21 days ago

                I had a similar switch on an old truck, and it did prevent it from being stolen once. It appeared to have started and moved far enough to get out of its parking space and was left in the lot with the door open.

                So it will work if your vehicle is such a sad decripit POS that it just appears to be broken when they try to start it.

              • Spot@startrek.website
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                21 days ago

                We had an old manual Ford Escort that we had drilled the ignition out of and put a switch in instead. No one figured it out without us telling them (friends family borrowing). Ours wasn’t even really hidden, just unexpected… thieves rarely want to spend extra time and effort on unexpecteds.

            • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              21 days ago

              I have a suzuki samurai that was intended to just be a project car.

              But now, I think the highest technology item it has is whatever transistor is firing the spark plugs. Its tempting to just daily it.

              • ouRKaoS@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                21 days ago

                I remember seeing guys in samurais off roading down ATV trails and I was always a little jealous.

                I’d love to get one to wrench on, but I don’t need another project.

        • filcuk@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          22 days ago

          That would not even be legal on today’s roads, at least in EU for new vehicles.

    • dltk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      I charge my EV using excess solar energy during the day. It’s handy to be able to start and stop charging based on solar output. We also use the app to send map locations to the navigation system. Finally, while I’m privacy sensitive and having a GPS tracker exposing my location through an API I don’t control is dodgy as hell, being able to confirm the vehicle location remotely has come in handy on occasion.

      While some neck beards may prefer to live in the 80s, I enjoy using and benefit from modern technology. I just wish regulators would require companies to use open systems. Tech in general isn’t’ the problem. Proprietary tech is the problem.

  • frongt@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    This is highly misleading. Hopefully there’s a link in the article to the original report on the GrapheneOS forums, where they talk about the app update breaking it on multiple platforms, not just GrapheneOS. It does not appear to be a block.

  • black_flag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    Is there really a ton of overlap between people privacy-conscious enough to install graphene on their phone and people who care so little that their car has an app?

    • WereCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      Basically all new cars have an app, you don’t have a choice if you’re buying new

      • SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 days ago

        My 2012 Toyota has an ‘app’ that I maybe tried once over ten years ago but haven’t used since. This is nothing new. It is called “Toyota Entune”

        • WereCat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          22 days ago

          Well, I have Corolla and I use the app mainly in winter to start the car and unfreeze front and rear windows. It’s quite convenient

  • mazzilius_marsti@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    i want a car with zero touchscreen. Heck, even no reverse camera - older folks have been driving just fine for years with just the side and rear mirrors. 3 pedals.

  • anon_8675309@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    Change it from they block GOS to they spy on you. Get it in front of as many people as possible. If they get huge negative press they’re more likely to change.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      They literally murdered millions and were in the press about it. I think they don’t care about headlines anymore.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      Not alone.

      I once dared to run Ford’s app on a rooted device. They permabanned my account including a hundred dollars worth of included charging over it without so much as a warning.

      Car vendors are absolute dicks about their apps.

  • AstralPath@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 days ago

    Cars didn’t need apps in the 1900’s and they sure as hell don’t need them now.

    • badgermurphy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      But they force me to pay for parts I can’t use without doing things I won’t and agreeing to things I don’t.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      Note it is very nice for me to be able to start the air conditioning in my electric car when it’s 38C out before I leave my desk.

      Other things are mildly convenient, like checking progress of charging, locking/unlocking doors remotely. It happens to be convenient to check problems, but that’s only because the in-car system isn’t very good, and I would happily take the in-car system being better.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      You don’t need a computer to make a car. But you might need most of one to meet fuel economy and safety standards.

      • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 days ago

        Yeah, good people had good ideas and created the computer link that allows your catalytic converter to function properly. As with all good things, some shithead ruined it and put Subaru’s remote start behind a paid app. Shit people ruining good things, tale as old as time.