• ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    A person being able to record what they see and hear is different than a robot that records everything. I strongly disapprove of flock and online ID verification. Those aren’t related to a person being able to make a personal record.

    • steelplatedmech@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      I’m sure that’s the argument Meta is making for their glasses.

      People aren’t any better, since people are more likely to be recording specifically for the purposes of resharing and we do live in a social media age.

      And these devices as they gain popularity would be relaying information back to the companies anyways, so make the claims of it being local or private not matter when that wouldn’t be the average wearable discrete tech that would gain mainstream popularity.

      • ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        As I said I’m not arguing for Meta’s glasses. They’re ripe for abuse and I have no doubt there are people who would use them in inappropriate ways and in non-public places where a person otherwise expects some privacy.

        While there are valid reasons for recording things both in public and private, without a doubt the ability to secretly record video will be abused.