• Nausicaa Rose@xoxo.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    @joe Please cite your sources. What improvements? How were these improvements tested, studied, and documented? Where were the results published?

      • Hypnotoad_@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Isn’t it great when you ask someone to cite their sources, and instead of doing so, they say “Google it”? They really sound smart when they do that, huh?

        • joe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          I see. You would rather feel correct than be correct. That’s not a wise strategy.

          The studies I allude to exist or don’t independently from whether I spoon feed them to you.

          Good to know.

          • Nausicaa Rose@xoxo.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            @joe If you were knowledgeable about medical AI & acting in good faith you’d have no trouble supplying sources to support your assertions & no reluctance to do so. It’s a super basic part of serious discussions.

            I provide multiple sources on the real dangers of using AI for medical purposes. All I asked was for you to do the same.

            Instead you resort to evasion and an ad hominem attack.

            If you have any serious, evidence-based thing to say, I’m happy to read it. Otherwise, have a good day.