• Geetnerd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    Well, some pedophiles have argued that AI generated child porn should be allowed, so real humans are not harmed, and exploited.

    I’m conflicted on that. Naturally, I’m disgusted, and repulsed. I AM NOT ADVOCATING IT.

    But if no real child is harmed…

    I don’t want to think about it, anymore.

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 days ago

      Issue is, AI is often trained on real children, sometimes even real CSAM(allegedly), which makes the “no real children were harmed” part not necessarily 100% true.

      Also since AI can generate photorealistic imagery, it also muddies the water for the real thing.

    • Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      that is still cp, and distributing CP still harms childrens, eventually they want to move on to the real thing, as porn is not satisfying them anymore.

    • misteloct@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 days ago

      Somehow I doubt allowing it actually meaningfully helps the situation. It sounds like an alcoholic arguing that a glass of wine actually helps them not drink.