• webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Not sure what the context is to warrant this reaction. I am not part of the anti-everything-ai mob.

    I fully agree on both points. Llms are here to stay and people need to learn to use them.

    That said: “please check the output before you hand it out” seems like such a basic minimum.

    i am actually shocked that usually smart people, including school teachers. Don’t practice this minimum of quality control.

    But this wasn’t a teacher, this was “the administration” a plural of people of which any could and should have done this minimum.

    At that point just hand out empty notebook instead. Its would actually be useable. It would be way less damaging to the image of the school. A School that cant write legible text in officials documents isn’t worth sending my kids too.

    • LincolnsDogFido@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Apologies. I read your comment after an inherently negative one and the negative connotation bled into yours. But yeah, we’re in agreance that the issue is ignoring the need for AI literacy of some sort. The bare minimum is being ignored by upper level decision makers trying to step into the roles they manage. In this case administrators thinking they know better than their best teachers and instead writing the curriculum themselves with LLMs.