• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    The real problem was always the grip being the serialized part of a firearm…

    As long as that’s true, firearm regulations are easy to circumvent.

    “Fire Control Units” make more sense, but is still just kicking the can down the road. Eventually those would be home made too.

    It’s like racoon-proofing a trashcan, if you do it step by step, all you’re doing is teaching raccoons to break into trash cans. If you start out secure enough, they never learn.

    • Dookieman12@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 hours ago

      The real problem was always the grip being the serialized part of a firearm…

      Not the grip, the receiver. Serializing the grip wouldn’t make any sense. Sometimes the receiver includes the grip, sometimes it doesn’t, it depends on the firearm.

      Either way, it’s basically the “frame” or “chassis” of the firearm. It doesn’t make sense to serialize any other portion because you could just swap that part out and have an ostensibly different firearm.

    • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Somebody once suggested removing all restrictions on the sale and possession of firearms, but severely regulating ammunition.

        • Septimaeus@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          22 hours ago

          TMK, while ammunition is somewhat regulated already, it’s even easier to manufacture with minimal resources. Hobbyists have been manufacturing ammunition for a very long time. In the short term, those manufacturers would fill in the demand gap left by factory ammo.

          It would certainly make ammunition more expensive, and thus potentially curb unnecessary use, but a lot of that unnecessary use is a big predictor WRT safe use, so I’m not entirely sure the net effect would be positive in the long term either.

          Also, as a general note…

          Since fascist governments always seek a monopoly on violence, the fact that I’ve been pro gun control for a very long time hasn’t stopped me from turning my head on the issue.

          Many comrades will undoubtedly disagree with me on this point, but:

          I think now is not the time for leftists to be pro gun control.

          • RamRabbit@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            19 hours ago

            Yep. Someone safely using their gun and teaching others how to safely use theirs can easily go through thousands of rounds in a pretty short time period. Someone murdering with one only needs a few rounds ever. Restricting ammo sale quantity only hurts safe and legal users.

            • masterspace@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 hours ago

              If it discourages people from owning guns or getting into guns as a hobby, then it makes society overal safer.

              • RamRabbit@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 hours ago

                Abstinence only education doesn’t work. Gun safety training is critical for safe use.

                Being against gun safety is an extremely counterproductive position.