• brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Microsoft doesn’t treat it as a tool; that’s the problem.

    …Which isn’t surprising. Not only because Microsoft is Microsoft, but they own like a third of OpenAI, so they have a vested interest in perpetuating the AI hype.

    • Haley@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Microsoft has far more people relying on their products to work, so you’d think they’d exercise far more diligence in making things work…

        • Haley@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          49 minutes ago

          It honestly makes me distrust the whole move because you would genuinely think that if the world depends on your stuff to work you would make it work, AI or not.

          • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            45 minutes ago

            We’re still talking about Microsoft, right?

            They have a looooong history of enshittification and footgunning that predates “AI” by decades, no matter how much the world has depended on their stuff. So no, I suppose I wouldn’t think that, as that would break decades of precedence for MS. But I suppose I never trusted them in the first place.