Nucleo’s investigation identified accounts with thousands of followers with illegal behavior that Meta’s security systems were unable to identify; after contact, the company acknowledged the problem and removed the accounts

  • Grimy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Although that’s true, such material can easily be used to groom children which is where I think the real danger lies.

    I really wish they had excluded children in the datasets.

    You can’t really put a stop to it anymore but I don’t think it should be something that’s normalized and accepted just because there isn’t a direct victim anymore. We are also talking about distribution here and not something being done in private at home.

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      such material can easily be used to groom children

      This literally makes no sense.

      • Grimy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Kids will do things if they see other children doing it in pictures and videos. It’s easier to normalize sexual behavior with cp then without.

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          This sounds like you’re searching really hard for a reason to justify banning it. Pretty tenuous “what if” there.

          Like, a dildo could hypothetically be used to sexualize a child. Should we ban dildos?

          It’s so vague it could apply to anything.

          • Grimy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Banning the tech, banning generated cp on the internet or banning it at home?

            I’m a big advocate of AI and don’t personally want any kind of banning or censorship of the tools.

            I don’t think it should be published on any kind of image sharing sites. I don’t hold people publishing it in high regard and I’m not against some kind of consequence. I generally view prison as unproductive though.

            At home, I’m not sure. People imo can do what they want behind closed doors. I don’t want any kind of surveillance but I don’t know how I would react if it got brought up at a trial, as a kind of proof if the allegations have something to do with that theme (child molestation).

            I also don’t think we need much of a reason to ban it on the web.

            • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              9 months ago

              It would probably make me distrust the prosecution, like if they’re bringing this up they must not have much to go on. Like every time a black man is shot by police they bring up that he smoked weed.

              I guess my main complaint is that it’s insane to view it as equivalent to real CP, and it’s harmful to waste any resources prosecuting it.

              • Grimy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                That’s fair. We can also expect proper moderation from social media sites. I’m okay with a light touch but It shouldn’t be floating around if you get what I mean.