How the fuck is this a “relatively normal” camera, or ANY kind of “normal”? People like you are the reason these companies get away with shit like this.
When it breaks laws. My area has two-party consent laws, so recording someone, whether audio or video, without their explicit consent is against the law. Children are often not held to the fullest extent of the law, and if they cannot be held responsible, then they shouldn’t have access to such devices until they can be.
I’m not naive to think that these devices will just go away or that the genie can go back into the bottle. But that is where regulation must act to protect people’s privacy rights.
Why is the minimum age not 18?
in what world is age restricting a relatively normal camera a reasonable decision?
creep detected
How the fuck is this a “relatively normal” camera, or ANY kind of “normal”? People like you are the reason these companies get away with shit like this.
because there isn’t anything particularly special about it other thsn it being a mass market product
When it breaks laws. My area has two-party consent laws, so recording someone, whether audio or video, without their explicit consent is against the law. Children are often not held to the fullest extent of the law, and if they cannot be held responsible, then they shouldn’t have access to such devices until they can be.
I’m not naive to think that these devices will just go away or that the genie can go back into the bottle. But that is where regulation must act to protect people’s privacy rights.
what ia the difference between this and a phone taped inside of a shirt?
perhaps it’s time to jump back to reddit.
they’ll tolerate your feigned stupidity over there.
Creeps exist above 18 years old too…
Yes but starting with an age limitation is a start on these damn things.