The relevant section is blunt. “The Software is licensed to you, not sold,” the EULA states. “You are granted a limited, non-exclusive, non-transferable, and personal license to play or use the Software for your private, non-commercial use on the system or device it was intended for.”

The terms also restrict renting, modifying, or obtaining games through unauthorised means. Nothing in there is new, technically. Sony’s EULA has always said this. The timing is what makes it land differently right now.

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Umm way longer then that. Its always been this way with video and software.

    • RambleMuffin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 hours ago

      To be fair, i recall Steam and GOG said that in case of a platform shutdown or if a game from your library is delisted, they can provide you a copy of the game files that you can keep and use.

      The Sony policy is much more shady.

      • Stern@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 hours ago

        in very limited terms I think Valve might fully remove games (like the crypto miner one) from accounts but other then that if you bought it you own it. I have transformers devastation which was delisted, and while the achievements won’t really show up on my account iirc, and I can’t sell the card drops on the market, I can still install and play it fine

        • LePoisson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Nah see my other comment. You don’t own shit on Steam. In fact the agreement specifically says you may need to use the client and be connected to the Internet in order to even play your games. Like if steam shut down tomorrow and just stopped existing it’s very possible they could legally just give you the middle finger and say sucks for you.

          IANAL and there’s more to it than just the contract you have with Valve as far as the law goes but the way the contract is written you have no ownership of anything on the platform.

          • bitwolf@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 hours ago

            I interpret that as Steam covering for some enhittified games on their store that require a constant internet connection.

            For example several games I have in my Steam library work fine offline.

            But the Megaman Battle Network remake subtly requires an internet connection to start the gamea from the title screen.

            Very misleading as the game technically boots offline but you can’t leave the title screen.

      • LePoisson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 hours ago

        The Sony policy is much more shady.

        It’s not.

        There’s a lot more in the agreement but this is the start of the licensing part.

        Valve hereby grants, and you accept, a non-exclusive license and right, to use the Content and Services for your personal, non-commercial use (except where commercial use is expressly allowed herein or in the applicable Subscription Terms). This license ends upon termination of (a) this Agreement or (b) a Subscription that includes the license. The Content and Services are licensed, not sold. Your license confers no title or ownership in the Content and Services. To make use of the Content and Services, you must have a Steam Account and you may be required to be running the Steam client and maintaining a connection to the Internet.

        (Emphasis mine)

  • ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 hours ago

    It says “limited” but does not define what limited is, so you legally paid for nothing guaranteed. You just give them money but they are obligated to give you nothing.

    • ID10T@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Not that this gives them a pass, but just to clarify the term: “limited” means you’re only allowed to use the software in the specific ways described by the EULA. The whole purpose of the EULA is to define exactly what “limited” means. In contrast, “unlimited use” would indicate that you’re allowed to use the software however you want unless specifically forbidden by the EULA.

      “Limited” does not mean that they can just make up whatever they want later and say “well that’s what we meant when we said limited.” The EULA describes the agreement you make, and both parties are bound to exactly what is described in that EULA.

      They can decide to change the EULA later and technically you are free to choose whether you want to accept those new terms, but the nasty part is that they can revoke your current license if you decide not to accept their new EULA and you’re just out of luck because you don’t actually own a copy.

      TL;DR it’s a shitty deal either way, but I think it’s important to be accurate. They do define what “limited” means or it wouldn’t be a valid license agreement. That does not imply that the EULA is a good one.

  • ZebulonP@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 hours ago

    The only solace is at least the majority of AAA games coming out now are so ass that i don’t want them anyway.

  • ZebulonP@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 hours ago

    The only solace is at least the majority of AAA games coming out now are so ass that i don’t want them anyway.

  • GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Just a reminder the Venn diagram of the G*mers spouting the “piracy isn’t stealing” and “valve is one of the good monopolies” and “support Palworld because fuck Nintendo” is a perfect circle

      • GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Valve had a massive hand in killing off physical PC releases and the sizable market of digital distribution.

        There were so many different platforms out there. Some that didn’t involve having to install a third party launcher to play physical discs. IGN even had one.

        Valve killed them with the same exclusivity deals you G*mer troglodytes bitch and moan about with Epic.

        • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 hours ago

          G*mer

          Thanks for idiocy-signaling by trying to make fetch happen, makes it easy to know ahead of time not to take anything you say seriously

  • Auli@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    I don’t get this you never owned your games even when buying a disc. The disc gave you a license to play the game.

    • ADTJ@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Nobody was coming to take the disc away from you after the online store shut down

  • atrielienz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Pretty much all software EULA’s are like this. Anything you “buy a license for” certainly. Same as it ever was.

  • justsomeguy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    game studios will fire the devs after the game is done and then tell the players they should buy the deluxe edition for a hundred bucks to play a week early but you need to be always online and don’t own the game.