Seeing Blackbird fly again after all these years would be incredible. I’d love to know what NASA has planned for it.

    • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 minutes ago

      lawl as long as you got your hate in, which isn’t an addiction, btw, all good

  • Shindo66@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Don’t you guys see it: If really crazy stuff happens and satellites are taken out of the sky, youre going to see to do some old-school reconnaissance.

  • Disaffected Scorpio@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 hours ago

    OK - so, Trump thinks they are cool and wants them back in action despite having better technology already in place. This tracks because of his dumb Trump-class battleship in development, which will be closed down soon after being commissioned because it’s a dumb idea.

  • it_depends_man@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 hours ago

    “If you got a ton of money, maybe you can make it happen,” he told Aviation Week. “They went to the Moon, you know.”

    That is SO funny.

  • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I mean if it’s the fastest, why would it really be retired? It’d be like Michael Phelps retiring after his first gold medal.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 hours ago

    NASA is researching quieter supersonic flight, and I can’t help but think of how the (also Lockheed Martin) X-59:

    Loooong boi

    Has a extreme wing profile/nose, not unlike SR-71:

    Almost as long

  • BillionaireStew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Perhaps NASA is doing it to make a trophy that might impress the imbecile emperor in hopes of securing funding for space science.

    Like in Rainbow Mars when the Time Travel Bureau has to go on safari to capture extinct pets for their imbecile emperor.

  • tigermountain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I guess we can put to rest the idea that the US government has successfully reverse engineered UFOs. Because if they had, there would be absolutely no need to do this if we could fly anywhere in the world in minutes or seconds and invisibly.

    • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 hours ago

      UFOs are most likely manmade, or probably something other-dimensional like angels or demons. The distances in space are too vast for visitors, the idea breaks down in more than one way once you dig into it.

      • MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I’m enjoying this - “We’ve learned enough science now that we realize it’s more likely fantasy creatures would be visiting us than that technologically advanced sentients would be traveling interstellar distances to visit.”

      • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 hours ago

        What’s really funny is the Blackbird was absolutely the cause of more than a few UFO sightings, some that have been confirmed in hindsight.

          • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Also, if they were billions of light years away and they looked at our planet from afar, they would see our planet billions of years ago. No reason to visit. What are the chances of a random visit?

            • potoooooooo 🥔@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Also why does increased activity in that sphere always correspond with batshit political times. Also why are all the UFO celebs obvious fucking grifters. Also…

            • JustPlainDave@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              41 minutes ago

              If we know that, so do they. If intergalactic travel is no different to them than driving across town is to you and me, why wouldn’t they?

  • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 hours ago

    They want a jet that works. It’s not NASA’s SR-71, the SR-71 was made by Lockheed.

    F35s are chronically grounded with software issues. They want a plane that works.

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Nasa’s plan: “Seeing Blackbird fly again after all these years would be incredible.”

  • isekaihero@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 hours ago

    The blackbird is a spy plane. It’s not something they can launch a payload from, not can it do anything space related. All it does is go super fast and snap pictures. Conspiracy theorists are going to have a field day with this because the only thing NASA might want it for is to surveil UFO’s. There are all sorts of stories of energy orbs and weird stuff being seen and then helicopters showing up later, after they’ve vanished.

  • Bluedragon012@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I was worried at first, why do they need that right now? But looking over the specs, this would be like taking a classic corvette to a bank robbery. So this is for sure for show and possibly to add more sensors to record data they couldn’t previously record. Me thinks they want to make another that could maybe go to space proper and deploy something.

    This is pure speculation, I’m not an expert.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 hours ago

      To speculate further, the stated reason for attacking Iran was nuclear weapon development. Perhaps there are sensors to track that, that can’t operate from satellite

      • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 hours ago

        If it were about Iranian nuclear weapon development, it wouldn’t be NASA doing the surveillance. Although weather phenomena is in NASA’s purview.

        We already had high confidence intel before the war Iran was not pursuing a nuclear weapon. But since then, Trump has expressed that a nuke is the only thing he would respect.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Whenever nasa’s involved it’s always something to do with airflow dynamics or something. If it was the US military I would assume that though.

      • LazyOldPervert@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I wouldn’t be surprised if they’re trying to use it to concept test something related to aero for the x-37

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 hours ago

        We know that NASA is doing research on both supersonic and hypersonic airflow. There are extremely few existing aircraft they could use for hypersonic testing