I don’t usually share what I build. Most of it lives on Codeberg or Github as a glorified off-site backup. 3-2-1 and all that. If I nuke my drive, I can pull it back down. That’s the whole point.
A while back I mentioned Pimaps here, a few people asked to see it, so I posted it. Got dunked on for AI slop despite explicitly marking which parts were AI-assisted (documentation and review- flagged with AIP). Similar story with Cliparr. I get it - Lemmy hates AI in any capacity.
But now I’m mildly curious: what does the community actually expect from devs when sharing a project? I’m not assuming everyone here is a professional dev - though I’d guess the overlap is significant - so I’m wondering where the bar sits.
Polish? Full handwritten codebase? Something else?
How much of the sausage making do you actually want to see?
why are you comparing manufacturing to inference? compare it to training.
Because 1 person is responsible for 1 person’s cost of inference.
Training is a whole industry manufacturing analogue, which is exactly the point: that cost must be amortised across every user, not attributable to one person.
We can compare 1 person to 1 person, or 1 industry to 1 industry. We can’t fairly compare 1 person to 1 industry.
See my reply elsewhwere to NGram.