A UC Berkeley researcher co-authored a study that raises profound questions about how we interact with artificial intelligence in education — and daily life.
It is my position that a machine cannot reliably determine whether a string of characters that would look identical whether produced by machine or human was produced by either. While you could very well be correct, your method for making such determination is—in my view—severely flawed.
Weak.
Seems you’ve been cooking for longer than 10 minutes…
Lol, offloading your lack of criticism of a point to an llm.
It shows 100% for Frankenstein
Read the text of the post. Are you admitting you can’t distinguish LLM output when you see it?
It is my position that a machine cannot reliably determine whether a string of characters that would look identical whether produced by machine or human was produced by either. While you could very well be correct, your method for making such determination is—in my view—severely flawed.
Eh. Go sit and spin.
Now say it without crying.
Imagine needing a computer to put your own thoughts into words for you.