• shadowtofu@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Hmm. Let’s say I add 6 SSDs, 2TB each, for a total of 600€. In a RAID6 configuration, that gives me 8TB of storage. Compare that to a classical NAS with 2×8 TB HDDs for a total of 350€.

    The HDDs will draw around 4W idle each, 8W in total. Assuming 0.3€/kWh, over a span of 5 years, that is approximately 100€. The power consumption of the SSDs will be negligible.

    So, just in terms of storage, the SSD solution is around 33% more expensive over 5 years. If you include the cost of the NAS itself, the price increment is even less noticeable.

    • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      But that is neglecting the performance aspect.

      Something like this can be very good for offloading large amounts of data onto a parity backed array either to be moved to a proper long term storage solution later or to be actively worked.

      High resolution / bitrate footage comes to mind, where you may be offloading multiple cameras at once and need high write performance.

      It’s pretty unlikely that SSDs will have price parity with spinning rust anytime soon, but the value in them has always been performance.

      • shadowtofu@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Yes, absolutely. Right now, SSDs are probably superior in comparison to HDDs in every category except for price (and long-term data integrity when switched off). But when you consider large parity raids and take into account the cost of electricity, even the price difference might only be small, making SSDs even more attractive.

  • Ulrich@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    The ME mini features 12GB of LPDDR5-4800 memory, which means the RAM will be soldered to the mainboard and not user upgradeable.

    Aaaaand I’m out.

    • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Solderer ram is slightly more power efficient. And this is probably a laptop board.

      That said, 12gb is slightly too low for my liking. Though an N200 CPU does not have much headroom to upgrade for anyway.

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Solderer ram is slightly more power efficient. And this is probably a laptop board.

        That may be true but I don’t really care either way.

        Though an N200 CPU does not have much headroom to upgrade for anyway.

        You can use at least 32GB.

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Yeah that’s just so dumb. Also, i wouldn’t be comfortable with the OS on eMMC storage. That’s hardly known for reliability. So close and yet so far.

    • Lemmchen@feddit.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      I hope for it to be somewhere in the $200-250 range. Everything above kinda makes it unattractive when the Flashstor 6 exists.

  • NarrativeBear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    This would be perfect if I could fit 24th NVMe devices in this, but not looking to pay more then ~300-350 CAD in a device with no hdd/ssd