Mama told me not to come.

She said, that ain’t the way to have fun.

  • 3 Posts
  • 950 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 11th, 2023

help-circle

  • you hand picked 2 peices from that whole page. The first one when you read the example below doesn’t even fit your case, so you left that out.

    Words have meaning given context, I pointed to the definition that fit the context. When talking about wealth and assets, “money” means anything that could be easily converted to cash. I didn’t copy the first because it wasn’t relevant to the context.

    Then you had to do mental gymnastics to make the second one fit.

    I provided two to drive home the point.

    How about an example. If I said, “how much money does Elon Musk have?”, that would obviously include his stocks and whatnot because he probably only has a few million in actual cash, if that. If you ask how much money I have on the street, I’d assume you’re talking about cash in my wallet, or maybe cash in my checking, and I wouldn’t include my stocks or even savings balance.

    Context matters a lot.

    But when conversing with normal people, you will be hard pressed to find people who agree.

    Are you saying that if I asked how much money you have in your retirement account, you’d say $0 because you only have stocks? If so, that’s really weird.


  • My vote is Podman with an immutable distro, like OpenSUSE MicroOS or Fedora Silverblue. Here are my reasons:

    • rolling base, with very minimal footprint, so you don’t need to worry about upgrades
    • podman runs proper rootless containers, so you get better security vs docker, which tends to run as root (breaking out does less damage if you manage permissions properly)
    • deploying a new service (or moving a service) just means copying configs and running, no concerns about what the host has
    • there’s nothing special about the host, so if MicroOS or Silverblue are abandoned, just copy the configs and data to a new host

    It’s a little more work to set up, but once things are running, it’s drama free. And I think that’s the best thing to optimize for, keeping things boring is a good thing.



  • That is basically Schrodinger’s cat

    No, it’s not.

    Schrödinger’s cat thought experiment is about things where observing state will impact the state. That would maybe apply if we’re talking about something unique, like an ungraded collectible or one of a kind item (maybe Trump’s beard clippings?) where it cannot have a value until it is either graded or sold.

    Stocks have real-time valuations, and trades can happen in near real time. There’s no box for the cat to be in, it’s always observable.

    money

    Look up the definition. Here’s the second usage from Webster:

    2 a: wealth reckoned in terms of money

    And the legal definition, further down on the same page:

    2 a: assets or compensation in the form of or readily convertible into cash

    Stocks are absolutely readily convertible to cash, and I argue that less liquid investments like RE are as well (esp with those cash offer places). Basically, if there’s a market price for it and you can reasonably get that price, it counts.

    When my stocks go down, I may not have realized that loss yet from a tax perspective, but the amount of money I can readily convert to cash is reduced.


  • Yes, my net worth went down.

    The point of “you don’t lose money until you sell” is to discourage panic selling, but it’s total bunk. When you assets lose value, you do lose money, and how much that matters depends on when you need to access that money. As the article says, you may not care that you lost money if you don’t need to access the money, but that doesn’t change the fact that you’re now poorer if your assets drop in value.