• skinnydugan@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    302
    ·
    13 days ago

    Dr. Cox was right: “I’m fairly sure if they took porn off the internet, there’d only be one website left, and it’d be called ‘Bring Back the Porn.'”

    • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      It’s not about blocking porn.

      It’s always about control. Conservatives want to control how you consume sexual content.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      12 days ago

      Politically speaking, it’s easy money. You pander to the conservatives with blocking propositions, get votes.

      *Who is going to champion the flip side?!"

  • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    192
    ·
    12 days ago

    I have to admit, of all the nations on earth, I never expected this sort of puritanical theatrical authoritarianism out of the french.

    • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      The percentages of respondents in surveys on infidelity answering “not a moral issue” from France are a bit of a cultural difference (from Australian perspective, anyway)

  • passepartout@feddit.org
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    13 days ago

    I’m shocked that this many people feel the need to disobey a rule that is only there to help the children. Next step must be to ban VPNs altogether, and enforcing all Internet users to be identified with their real identity (/s obviously).

    • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      12 days ago

      The VPNs will be harder to ban. Not just from a technical standpoint, but politically as well. Big businesses will be absolutely opposed to VPN bans.

      • passepartout@feddit.org
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        12 days ago

        There will be a lot of businesses who feel the (justified) need to hide the entrypoint to their infrastructure behind a VPN.

      • ifItWasUpToMe@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        I feel they could easily ban VPN companies (maybe?), which is what 99.9% of people that want to browse from a different location use.

        This won’t affect companies at all as they would be using their own VPN.

        • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          The only way the sovereign nation of France can ban VPN companies not based in France is to block the IP address of every single entry point of every single VPN company and keep doing so as they add new entry points (I bet the response on the VPN company side would be to start having some kind of dynamic VPN server thing).

          And then, as somebody else already pointed out, any technically inclined person can just rent a VPS anywhere in the World and fire up their own VPN server on it.

    • affiliate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      12 days ago

      if the VPN ban doesn’t work then the only reasonable course of action would be to ban the internet entirely. it’s the only way the children can be truly safe.

  • BetaBlake@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    How about you just parent your children? But it’s not about the children, that’s just always the convenient excuse

  • Devolution@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    13 days ago

    Why do the French even need Pornhub when their basic movies are very porn adjacent?

    • FerretyFever0@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      I blame the French for 120 days of Sodom burning my eyeballs, and I just skimmed the Wikipedia article. One of them chose to print that instead of burning the notes. Anyways, why is the hub being blocked in France?

      • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        12 days ago

        French politicians passed a law that requires porn sites collect pii (identity) in order to access the site. PornHub won’t violate the privacy and security of their users, so they simply block the locales that pass such laws.

      • merdaverse@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        12 days ago

        “Children should be reading good old stories like 120 days of Sodom, not this Pornhub filth” - probably some French conservative somewhere.

        • FerretyFever0@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          12 days ago

          The Marquis de Sade was an elected official btw. He would’ve jacked off to shock sites. Says quite a bit about some of the French that it wasn’t burned. It should’ve been. No historical or entertainment value, just pure degeneracy.

      • tarknassus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        Protest on them trying to enact age consent laws.

        By showing the message rather than Pornhub’s vast library of adult content, Aylo “is communicating directly with the French people to tell them how dangerous, how potentially privacy-infringing, and how ineffective the French law is”, Solomon Friedman of Aylo’s owner, Ethical Capital Partners, told reporters in a video call on Tuesday.

        Paris has this year gradually introduced requirements for all adult websites to have users confirm their age with details like a credit card or ID document.

        In a bid to preserve privacy, operators must offer a third-party “double-blind” option that would keep the platforms themselves from seeing users’ identifying information.

        Edit - the sauce - Pornhub, YouPorn owner suspends access to French users over age verification law

    • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      Reminds me of the running joke I had with a French bloke in a place were I worked in about how Jacquie-Et-Michelle (NSFW) was an unmissable part of French Culture, which none of our other colleagues seem to - or at least admitted to - get.

  • meowmeowbeanz@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    Peak French stupidity, this isn’t about protecting kids - it’s about building surveillance infrastructure. Back in 2024, critics already called this the foundation for a “Great Firewall of France”. Once you have the legal framework to block websites and force ISPs to implement monitoring, mission creep is inevitable.

    The technical approach is laughably naive. They’re essentially creating a centralized system that could easily become a database of citizen sexual preferences. Even with their “double anonymity,” you’re still creating digital fingerprints and metadata trails.

    Most importantly, it won’t work. Kids will just use VPNs - the same way adults are already doing. You’re not protecting anyone; you’re just pushing everyone toward circumvention tools while normalizing government control over what adults can access online.

    It’s perfectly French because it combines maximum bureaucratic complexity with zero practical benefit, all while creating new opportunities for state overreach. Classic.

    • xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 days ago

      i think it should be a little harder for a child to watch anal prolapse fisting porn than “click yes if you’re of legal age”….
      but… not a good excuse for creating a citizen surveillance database.

      • meowmeowbeanz@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 days ago

        Fair point on the current system being theater, but here’s the thing - any centralized age verification system creates exactly the surveillance database you’re worried about.

        The “harder than clicking yes” solutions all have the same fundamental flaw: they require collecting and storing sensitive data that becomes a honeypot for both state actors and bad actors. Upload your ID? Now there’s a database linking your identity to your viewing habits. Credit card verification? Same problem, plus you’re creating financial trails.

        The technical reality is that determined kids will circumvent anything you put in place. We already saw this play out - VPN registrations exploded 1,000% in France within 30 minutes. You’re not actually protecting kids; you’re just normalizing data collection on adults while teaching every teenager in the country how to use Tor.

        Better approach would be device-level parental controls that parents can configure without creating centralized databases. Let Apple, Google, Microsoft handle age verification through their existing account systems where the data stays local. That way you get actual protection without building the infrastructure for a surveillance state.

        The French solution gives you the worst of both worlds - ineffective protection AND mass surveillance. Classic government efficiency.

        • xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 days ago

          that’s a lack of imagination….
          just because i can’t think of a great solution doesn’t mean there isn’t one.
          off the top of my head, here’s a system without a centralized surveillance database:

          1. porn site gives you a random token,
          2. you then hash that with a time-stamp,
          3. get the token signed by your government ID system (like a dmv),
          4. return the signed hash.
          5. the government only knows that you used age verification for something somewhere….

          now the hard part is just explaining cryptographic signatures and hashes to people….
          of course people could still give a kid a verified account, but at least it’s harder for them to access it, i don’t need perfection….

      • mechoman444@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        12 days ago

        Pervertube. Thisvid. Motherless.

        I just realized indicating these websites might have revealed a little too much about the kinds of porn I like to watch. ☹️

        • Machinist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          12 days ago

          Whoa. I haven’t heard of Pervertube. I have specific tastes involving a dirty mattress with no sheet or at least one overflowing ashtray.

          NEW PORN!!!1!!!1!!!

        • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          12 days ago

          Which one pops the “you are leaving the trans section to go the straight section, are you sure?”

          I really don’t think I should be called out just because I like straight porn.

          • Krompus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            edit-2
            12 days ago

            Spankbang alone blows PornHub out of the water in my opinion. So does Xvideos. I guess it depends what you’re into? I don’t like all of the incest shit on PornHub.

        • Ledericas@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 days ago

          xvideos is a PH affiliate i think, if you noticed ph or these adjacent sites will have links to each other that have similar sanitationized like PH did.

      • Evotech@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 days ago

        As a «produced porn» enjoyer…

        Usenet Stashdb Local stash instance

        Treat porn like you do tv shows :p

        I don’t really care for home video stuff

    • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      Which is weird since I often don’t hear much spoken dialogue in most porn films other than fake moans and and orgasms. Also my focus tends to be elsewhere…

        • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          12 days ago

          Stop with the classy French French! I want vulgar Canadian French.

          “Ahh tabernack! T’es une vrai p’tite pute! T’fesse va ê’re plein de ma cum comme u’poutine!”

          “Mais fuck you! Plus vite MAINTENANT… OUAI YEAH! COMMMMMMMEEEEEEEEEEEE ÇÇÇÇÇAAAAA!!! Fuck me t’as une monstre cock!”

  • Ledericas@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    pornhub is so sanitized now, im guessing its mostly because of the OF videos. most of them are on sites that arnt affiliated with PH.

    • Scrollone@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      12 days ago

      After the big purge of some years ago, PornHub has became useless. The good real videos are elsewhere.

  • njordomir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    11 days ago

    I hate how VPN access is the scaffolding holding the building up making things look normal. You can visit all your normal web sites, you can bypass georestrictions, you can be a little less tracked than you might otherwise be. But what happens when they decide to do away with that scaffolding and we all find out they tore down the house behind it while we were enjoying “normalcy”. Too much of making the web functional depends on vpns and adblocking. We shouldn’t have to do this stuff and Chromes adblocking scandle should impact millions of users all around the world unilaterally removing adblocking from the web. I fear for the day we have a US only internet and a global internet, not just on paper, but in actual practice.