• lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    7 months ago

    I don’t see the problem. It’s from a company called “Dragon Lawyers”. If it was idk “Flower Lawyers” they could put a flower with a tie or something. What is it with those snowflakes not being able to handle a decent watermark. It’s not like it’s somehow offensive.

    • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’m going to take a flying leap and assume you’ve never come close to court proceedings.

      No serious law firm is doing full page multicolored graphics as watermarks. Flower Lawyers doing what you’ve described would get a similar response. If this was a picture of the lawyer for the case scowling instead they’d get laughed out of court.

      • MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 months ago

        I assume you would only do that on like a sample document for a client or a draft, specifically so it won’t be used in an actual court.

    • Chozo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      7 months ago

      What you didn’t see was, on the reverse side of these documents, the dragon lawyer has no pants on. He’s full ass-out. Just straight-up Donald Duck’ing it.

    • Zahille7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      I saw tons of billboards in southwest Tennessee for a law firm called “Lion Law” and all their billboards had pictures of animals and some kind of play on words, like a picture of a snake and the caption was something like “divorce that snake in the grass today!”

      And I was just like “damn, that’s kinda clever.”

  • brax@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Judge should be fired. Does the dragon somehow change the words on the page? If the watermarks affects the ability for screen readers, then fine. Otherwise, the judge is clearly unable to form an unbiased opinion and is willing to allow something irrelevant like appearance bias their cases.

  • callouscomic@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    Pretending this country has any professionalism whatsoever. Considering who is president and the shitty behavior of most politicians … get fucked.

  • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Honestly pretty sick dragon. Great PR. But yeah definitely they should use some sort of cryptographic signature, not (on its own at least) an image watermark like this haha