• MasterBlaster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Didn’t you hear? China’s been one gigantic people’s union since 1949. That’s the whole point of Communism. As you can see, it’s working swimmingly well.

      • MasterBlaster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I was implying nothing about any other type of societal organization. However, since you mention it, I will point out that Capitalism (which is an economic, not political philosophy) can become horrific for the same reasons Communism becomes horrific - People. Communism was a response to naked, mercantilist Capitalism. Marx’s heart was in the right place, but he was describing a Utopia.

        I think Democracy (in its many forms) designed with checks and balances is a viable answer to the problem. It ain’t magic, though. People still need to ensure it remains balanced. We’ve been having some trouble with that lately. It took fifty years of planning for the authoritarians to get us here. It’s a good sign it was so difficult, but now we have to work hard to fix the mess.

    • josemf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Chinas communist party is as communist as trump is a democratic leader.

      Or as our German „Christian party“ is christian…

    • KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Tell me you don’t know what communism is and can’t recognise a dictatorship under the guise of communism without telling me you don’t know what communism is.

      I imagine that you’re from the US? If so, it’s understandable. Dr. Strangelove was what opened my eyes to how demonised it is and how misguided people in the US are to its true ideology and meaning.

      The USSR, where the gov controlled most of the means of production, is the antithesis of communism.

      • entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Sarcasm. The comment you replied to was being facetious. Obviously things are not going swimmingly. Use your context clues.

        • MasterBlaster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Thank you for the assist. You are correct. I made the fatal assumption that most people discussing such things would have the context of Mao, the long march, the various purges, the decades of poverty, the suppression and outright murder of minorities under their belt and would recognize that the statement was so obviously false that it could only be taken as sarcasm. Unfortunately, I didn’t account for people having arrogance and a sense of other people being ignorant morons by default.

        • KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yeah no, sounds more like a dig at communism, ya know, the usual rhetoric, hey, look at this dictatorship, as you can clearly see, communism doesn’t work

          • MasterBlaster@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yes. I simply found it somewhat ironic that someone would point out that a Communist nation would need unions given the definition of Communism. It was to me a Monty Python level of dry humor to suggest that, and I felt my response should match that dry humor.