• someguy3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    many of his most reckless efforts in his first administration were stymied only because of others in his administration who blocked, delayed or watered down his aims to ensure that he could not put himself above the law or the country.

    I often wonder what would have happened if his first term was unleashed. Eg if McCain voted yes to dismantle ACA. If Trump got his way the first time, would he have gotten in the second?

    • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      If Trump had gotten his way the first time, we’d be in a fascist dictatorship that is 9 years old now instead of one.

  • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I can see the URL, I know it’s the NY Times … but it feels like it could just as well be a link to the Book of Revelation. Fuck this timeline sucks

  • humanamerican@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    The people who needed to be convinced think the New York Times is globalist propaganda. If they even noticed the existence of this article they would assume it was a made up smear campaign against Dear Leader.

    Also, our media (even the “liberal media”) is part of the problem. For example, they did such a terrible job explaining Trump’s attempts to steal the 2020 election that to this day even many anti-Trump Americans don’t understand how fucked up it was.

    The primary blame is on the sociopaths in charge and the troglodytes who voted them in, but there is plenty of guilt to go around.

  • humanamerican@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    The people who needed to be convinced think the New York Times is globalist propaganda. If they even noticed the existence of this article they would assume it was a made up smear campaign against Dear Leader.

  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    The only thing I’m aware of which was predicted by anyone which he hasn’t done or tried to do is launch nukes at North Korea. Which he has threatened that. I think he’s enough of a psychopath that he is not above launching nukes if he ever finds himself in the position Hitler did. I mean why wouldn’t he? He’s shown us thousands and thousands of times that he cares about a singular person and that is himself.

    But yeah, every fucking concern we had has been validated and then some. And these fucking zombies don’t care because they somehow can pretend he does nothing wrong, literally no matter what.

    Never has there been a more disappointing time to have a working brain. All of this would’ve made way more sense before everyone could instantly check facts any time they wanted. Yet somehow, that ability made people less informed. I get that propaganda works and all, but I still will never understand how people could remain so adamantly ignorant when it’s genuinely so easy to learn and to stop being ignorant. I could even understand a world where people hate Trump’s specific actions but support a lot of the things he does. Would still be disappointing but it would make sense. Instead we live in a world where he can do anything and be loved for it no matter how heinous.

  • ceenote@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Donald Trump was a lot of peoples’ fault. One article nailing him doesn’t cancel out all the articles that normalized or sane washed him, or ran with his narrative. Nor does it undercut all the well-justified mistrust of legacy American media. It’s not as if people started trusting pundits out of nowhere - they started looking for commentary and news from alternate sources because yeah, actually, legacy media does work for the wealthy. Not that MAGA pundits don’t, but that’s beside the point.