• NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    297
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    I get the impression that the cops are about to hate facial recognition all of the sudden, for no particular reason

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      125
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      There’s a reason ICE conceal their faces.

      They know what they’re doing is wrong and don’t want to be held accountable if their fascist rule collapses.

      • ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 months ago

        So just use one too and blend in. Put on a stupid Trump or racist hat, and if you are not white, put on gloves. Then surround them.

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        44
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        They know what they’re doing is wrong

        Is that why the protestors wear them too?

        • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 months ago

          Please post the entirety of your online history.

          Surely there’s no reason to hide.

          Whether what you’ve done is entirely legal (or not) authoritariaism doesn’t care.

          What is done in a free society is punished by small men with anger control issues.

          What you may find reasonable to say in a free society, could, under a government opposed to free expression, land you in el Segundo - without your wallet.

          The gestapo hide their faces because they know what they do is wrong, and to hide from justice.

          People who protest or simply appreciate privacy do so because they understand the potential for retribution and being disappeared.

          • Ulrich@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            6 months ago

            Please post the entirety of your online history. Surely there’s no reason to hide.

            …we’re talking about hiding though

            Whether what you’ve done is entirely legal (or not) authoritariaism doesn’t care.

            That goes both ways. That was my entire point.

            • Tiger666@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Who is in power again? The protesters are not making anyone disappear. Goodbye, troll.

              • Ulrich@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                6 months ago

                You think individuals can’t be targeted because they’re “in power”? Why do you think they’re wearing them?

    • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      Upvoted and agreed, not least because I just learned that “all of the sudden,” while at present a nonstandard variant of “all of a sudden,” has valid history.

      And of course it doesn’t matter in this casual context!

      But in formal writing, in this era, using “a” will avoid distracting the reader from your main point.

      • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        “All of the sudden” is only valid because it’s so commonly (incorrectly) used. Much as it annoys me, that’s just how language works.

        • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          “of the sudden” (1570) actually predates “of a sudden” (Shakespeare) according to my OED as squinted at through the nifty magnifying glass. But it’s been considered obsolete for a long time despite having all of a sudden experienced a resurgence.

          (Note, I modernized the spellings of “sudden” rather than try to switch focus back and forth)

          • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            People aren’t saying it because they’re language scholars, it’s because they misheard the proper modern usage. So it goes for many language shifts.

      • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Non-Anglo here.
        Totally not distracted bcs my brain autocorrected it to “all of a sudden” without even noticing.
        A bit like “It deosn’t mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are”
        Also never seen/heard the “the” variant. (Well consciously that is).