Jellyfin Server has a flatpak (and other packing formats too) version that you can easily install without docker directly on your PC. Would it make sense for Immich to do the same? In my mind it would be super useful, I could sync my photos when my PC is on and when is off rely on my local photos only since my main goal is having a backup of them.
Am I crazy or it makes sense?
Immich needs an external database.
Jellyfin uses built-in sqlite.
This is exactly why flatpaks are trickier for Immich - managing the PostgreSQL dependency outside the sandbox is a real headache since flatpak isolation would complicate the database conection, whereas Jellyfin’s SQLite just works as a self-contained file.
It’s extra work to maintain and test another release format — and the core developers want to focus on making software.
No one is stopping you from rolling your own flatpak.
It probably can be packaged in a flatpak but it would be more of a challenge than using the docker package. You could implement your use case today with the default docker compose setup. You could be up and running in minutes. Start it with
-dand it would even start automatically on reboot. It won’t consume any more resources than a flatpak version.Just try this in a directory somewhere: https://immich.app/docs/install/docker-compose/
As for docker itself, if you’re on Ubuntu or Debian, you can use the docker version from the stock repos. The package is
docker.ioand for compose you wantdocker-compose-v2Thanks for the info
A podman quadlet would be a great way to manage the Immich container.
Keep in mind your system will already have the plumbing for podman. So it’s not as bad if you’re averse to using docker.
It’d be managed as a systemd unit. IMO its a better method than flatpak.
Considering that Linus himself only makes binaries for windows and mac, and doesn’t bother packaging for Linux because it’s so painful, I’m not surprised that the immich folks didn’t make one.
I guess I’m a bit confused, immich does have a few docker containers available, I’m using one for backups and it works great.
In my mind it would be super useful, I could sync my photos when my PC is on and when is off rely on my local photos only since my main goal is having a backup of them.
You could do this perfectly with the docker version, so just curiosity here, why not user docker?
Is it because you don’t want to install docker for only Immich? (you could also install other selfhosted server/apps as bonus),
would you be against snap? As someone already mentioned, there is a snap version.
If the important thing is having backups of your photos, there are alternative apps with different packaging formats.
You could make a request for flatpak, and see if other users also would like it, but you would have to wait for feedback from devs and understand if they don’t have the resources or willingness to maintain it.
Am I crazy or it makes sense?
If I’m interested in a specific app, I see what packaging formats it has and see how to install it and try it out. Only if I’m having issues with it (that can’t be solved), or can’t run it on my specific distro with the available packaging formats, I try to suggest/request a different format.
I know how to use docker (a bit) and I have already installed Immich with it some time ago, but it would be nice to have an easier alternative, especially for less tech inclined people
Surely this is better-suited for the Immich GitHub Discussions page, no?
I wanted to have a little bit of feedback before opening an issue or a discussion there
