Ring founder Jamie Siminoff is back at the helm of the surveillance doorbell company, and with him is the surveillance-first-privacy-last approach that made Ring one of the most maligned tech devices. Not only is the company reintroducing new versions of old features which would allow police to request footage directly from Ring users, it is also introducing a new feature that would allow police to request live-st

  • skisnow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    5 months ago

    I bought a cheap Chinese security camera for a fraction of the cost of a Ring and signed up for their cloud storage system. I’m more comfortable with the Chinese government being able to access footage of my backyard, than the current US administration.

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Or you could choose an option that does neither. Why feed the autocrats at all?

      • skisnow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        eh, you might have a spare day to source a completely uncompromised camera and find someone in a trusted neutral country who runs an unproblematic hosting service and configure a system to do offsite storage in a secure way, but I’ve got other stuff going on. If you can source me a reasonable alternative I’m happy to use it when it comes time to renew my subscription.

        • Maestro@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Just buy a Reolink Doorbell. Pop in an SD card. Put in on your wifi or LAN and access it with your browser. You’re done. It’s all local. There’s an optional app that does need an external server, but that’s optional and there is no subscription.

          • OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Ok, but one of the most important use cases is non-local access.

            If I’m at home I can just go to the door.

              • youmaynotknow@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                5 months ago

                This is highly unlikely to be able to notify you of someone ringing the door. It’s doable, but takes some tinkering which most people are not able to do because of all the reasons mentioned in previous comments.

        • tabular@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 months ago

          An offsite server is not under your control and accessible by who knows. Surely it is still a privacy concern.

          Privacy is like security in that it costs time. Most people don’t spend time on even having a conversation like this but if something bothers you then finding a spare day is easier.

        • Dr. Moose@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          5 months ago

          Nah you’re just being lazy. Its really not that hard. At least be ashamed man instead of this defeatist bullshit.

          • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            What you’re saying makes me think you aren’t aware of the technical knowledge of your typical smart doorbell or cam user, which is basically little to none.