In a nutshell: As Microsoft prepares to end free security updates for Windows 10 in October, a significant challenge looms for charities that refurbish and distribute older computers to those in need. With an estimated 240 million PCs unable to meet the stringent hardware requirements for Windows 11, these organizations face a difficult decision: provide potentially insecure Windows 10 systems, send them to e-waste recyclers, or explore alternative operating systems like Linux.

Microsoft’s requirements for Windows 11 include a 1GHz or faster CPU with at least two cores, 4GB of RAM, 64GB of storage, Secure Boot capability, and TPM 2.0 compatibility. However, the supported Intel CPU list only goes back to 8th Gen chips, introduced in 2017, while the AMD list includes Ryzen 2000 series and above.

    • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      My 10yo netbook runs the latest Debian Linux. If it was running on its original OS (XP) it would not only crawl but be dangerously vulnerable.

      • franticdisembowel@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        Wow, pretty unbelievable a netbook was still being sold with XP in 2015 lol. How’d you come about getting that?

    • Australis13@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      Precisely what I am doing. Too many devices that still do what I need simply to ditch just because Windows 10 is EOL. I’m a bit over half-way in my migration (still have a few programs to sort out - may have to run a W10 VM for a couple of them as they don’t work under WINE and there is no Linux equivalent).

    • Singletona082@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      My desktop is a 2012 lenovo office machine. Fresh SSD, wifi card, and an… OK graphics card have had the thing purring for me since 2018.

    • Flagstaff@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      What if the SSD and everything else are 9 years old? Is that worth risking data loss over?

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        With the age of those computers you might even be looking at a HDD. Those should definitely be replaced, SSDs, it depends.

        In any case a new 128G SDD is on the order of 15 bucks, well worth the investment even for an age-old system (unless you have a bit more extra cash because the GB/buck optimum is in the 0.5-2T range).

        • Flagstaff@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Well, an additional problem with this Lenovo ThinkPad is that its “A” key is coming loose if not pressed on the rightmost side. I’ve also dropped it 3x from over a foot’s distance (knocked off a table, etc.), which damaged its Bluetooth receiver. So I’m wondering if it’s even still worth maintaining…

          It’s definitely got 2×256 GB SSDs in it, though they’re also all from 2016-17, hence my predicament of sorts…

  • orclev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Microsoft’s requirements for Windows 11 include a 1GHz or faster CPU with at least two cores, 4GB of RAM, 64GB of storage,

    All of this is no problem and essentially any computer manufactured in the last couple decades can meet these requirements. They’re effectively irrelevant for this discussion.

    Secure Boot capability, and TPM 2.0 compatibility.

    This is the problem right here. Pretty much every last computer you hear about that isn’t compatible it’s one or both of these, almost always the TPM 2.0 module.

    That of course is if the reason you aren’t “upgrading” is because the hardware isn’t supported. For a great many of us our hardware is supported, we just don’t want all the bullshit anti-features Microsoft has crammed into Windows 11. Windows 10 was already bad enough with it’s constant telemetry spyware, that annoying Cortana garbage shoehorned in anywhere they could manage, the absolute atrocity that they turned the start menu search function into, and the annoying Teams and OneDrive integrations that randomly reinstalled and re-enabled themselves after updates.

    Then MS went and had to cram in even more spyware by way of their horrible copilot garbage. All for what? What are we getting with 11 that’s better than 10? What feature justifies that upgrade? Nothing, that’s the answer. There’s no reason at all that 11 needed to be made.

    • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Microsoft’s requirements for Windows 11 include a 1GHz or faster CPU with at least two cores, 4GB of RAM, 64GB of storage,

      All of this is no problem and essentially any computer manufactured in the last couple decades can meet these requirements. They’re effectively irrelevant for this discussion.

      IDK about you, but the Pentium 4 is not an ideal CPU for modern workloads. The absolute oldest hardware I would use today for anything is the Core2Duo with 8GB RAM. I know this because we have an A1276 MacBook Pro with the P8600 C2D, and it’s barely sufficient. You look at it and the cooling fan begins a launch sequence 😅 and that’s running Linux Mint. Windows 10/11 would grind it to a halt trying to run multiple tasks.

      • Cort@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Windows 10 actually ran ok with all the aero effects turned off on my Mac mini core2duo T7600 & 3.25gb ram, wish I could have gotten 64 bit running though.

        • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I believe it, but the Core architecture was a pretty significant upgrade from Netburst. Pentium 4 CPUs were really good at converting electricity to heat 😅

    • Lippy@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      All of this is no problem and essentially any computer manufactured in the last couple decades can meet these requirements. They’re effectively irrelevant for this discussion.

      Not quite. Windows 11 requires an Intel 8th gen or AMD Zen+ CPU or newer, with some odd exceptions. I’ve dealt with some machines that only fail on the CPU check and can confirm that Windows 11 will refuse to install without bypassing those arbitrary ‘requirements’.

      I do agree with the rest of your post though.

  • DigDoug@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    If you’re buying a PC that doesn’t have the specs to run Windows 11, you’re probably only using it for web browsing tasks anyway. I’d wager that many of them wouldn’t even notice that they’re using a different OS.

    • Fondots@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 month ago

      My PC isn’t compatible with Windows 11.

      I cobbled it together from spare parts as my wife has upgraded over the years. It was a pretty beefy computer when she first built it, and it’s gotten a couple upgrades along the way, but the CPU and MoBo are probably about 10 years old if not older (it’s an AMD FX-something, I’m unsure of the exact specs, it’s whatever parts were in her bin of cast-offs stuck with a new case and hard drive)

      And I’m happily gaming on it. I may not be maxing out the latest AAA titles in glorious 8k epic quality 120hz HDR VR yadda yadda yadda, but I can still run pretty much any game out there on some acceptable mid-to-high quality settings and decent performance.

      I’m probably going to have to either upgrade the MoBo and processor come October, or make the jump to Linux (which I’m not exactly opposed to, but I do like not having to fuck with wine and proton to run my games)

      It’s a perfectly serviceable board, still doing just fine by me, and there’s no reason it can’t give someone at least a few more good years of use, even as a gaming computer if you’re not a graphics snob.

      But if I decide to upgrade, unless I find someone who wants to run Linux on it, or understands the risk of running win10 with no security updates, it’s probably going to become e waste.

        • Fondots@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          Lol, I’ll keep that in mind, internet stranger. I do have a lot of techy friends who I’ll probably offer it up to first, and I haven’t quite ruled out running Linux myself either to keep as my main PC or to use as a media server or something, but I’ll keep you in mind if I’m looking to get rid of it in a few months.

          If it does come to that, pay for shipping (or pick it up if you happen to be local) and it’s yours. Feel free to hit me up to ask about it come november-ish if I don’t reach out first. No guarantees it will be available, but I’d rather it go to someone who’s going to use it than be waste

      • orclev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        1 month ago

        In other words it was the sales department doing what they always do, pulling complete bullshit out of their ass and then expecting the engineering team to deliver it.

        • L3ft_F13ld!@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          Would not be surprised at all. Just want people to know about that instead of still being mad about some bullshit someone spewed years ago.

      • ozymandias117@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Where did Microsoft put an official announcement saying the statement from an official Microsoft employee, Jerry Nixon, speaking at an official Microsoft conference, Ignite, was incorrect?

        Edit:

        When reached for comment, [Microsoft] didn’t dismiss them at all

        Recent comments at Ignite about Windows 10 are reflective of the way Windows will be delivered

        https://www.theverge.com/2015/5/7/8568473/windows-10-last-version-of-windows

  • SayCyberOnceMore@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 month ago

    IMHO each new version of Windows looks & feels different to the last anyway, so most (general users) wouldn’t know the difference - they just need a web browser an email client and an office suite.

    That 1 Windows-only program they use is probably not compatible with the next version of Windows too

    • shortrounddev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      That 1 Windows-only program they use is probably not compatible with the next version of Windows too

      No it probably is, Microsoft puts a ton of effort into backwards compatibility

      • ඞmir@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah a lot of problems with Windows can actually be explained by some kind of backwards compatibility lol

    • JustARegularNerd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’ve been planning on selling a couple older laptops (Latitude E6420 and ThinkPad X240) and this is a fantastic idea. The former laptop doesn’t even have Windows 10 drivers (that I know of)

      • ChogChog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        The ThinkPads are great. I have an X220 that I have running Mint that I use in my garage. Its use cases are music streaming, displaying PDF Service Manuals/Technical Diagrams, and web queries for random questions/video instructions. I’m working on trying to see if I can get Wine to let me run some diagnostic software on it too.

        It can certainly do more than that as I used it through school a number of years ago for note taking and small programming projects. But it’s retired to being the tank that it is and it’s amazing for that.

        • JustARegularNerd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I totally agree, they’re mad little machines. I’m only selling mine because I can’t stand the combined touchpad/track point setup Lenovo did in that generation and I quickly replaced it with an X260. Both of them are capable of damn good battery life (I get about 5-6 hours from my X260)

  • melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 month ago

    how is this a hard choice? windows will keep ratcheting to shit. it will not improve. the question is: linux now, or tons of expense and trouble, and linux later?

    • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Secure boot has been a requirement for like 10+ years now. I think windows 8 was when they required it on all new computers. You could turn it off if you really wanted and I think it would still work, but why would you? Linux has played well with it for almost as long.