themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoReFS is better than NTFS, but Microsoft refuses to let regular users have itwww.xda-developers.comexternal-linkmessage-square25fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkReFS is better than NTFS, but Microsoft refuses to let regular users have itwww.xda-developers.comthemachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square25fedilink
minus-squareundefined@lemmy.hogru.chlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-22 months agoRight? I’ve gone through ReiserFS, ext3, ext4, XFS, Btrfs, ZFS; hell on macOS I’ve been through HFS+ and AFS. And clunky ol’ Microsoft is still on fucking NTFS.
minus-squareAppoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoWhy change it if it works? What is so bad about NTFS?
minus-squareundefined@lemmy.hogru.chlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoWhy use NTFS if FAT32 works?
Right? I’ve gone through ReiserFS, ext3, ext4, XFS, Btrfs, ZFS; hell on macOS I’ve been through HFS+ and AFS. And clunky ol’ Microsoft is still on fucking NTFS.
Why change it if it works?
What is so bad about NTFS?
Why use NTFS if FAT32 works?
Because 4GB file limit?
exFAT then