• FauxLiving@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        It is negligence, but information workers have very little regulation when it comes to handling personal data (outside of specific fields, like healthcare and finance).

        I say this as an information worker who handles a lot of personal data. Worst case scenario, I get fired and can’t use them as a reference. Unless I’m intentionally stealing data and using it for crimes there’s no risk of criminal penalties.

        We needed privacy laws 20 years ago but the tech bros assured everyone that it would be fine and for a long time they were mostly responsible with our data. But now we’re well into the enshittification of the Internet and the lack of regulation is allowing these kinds of harms to become common.

        Though, in a sane regulatory framework Tea wouldn’t be allowed to exist in the first place. The entire point of the site is to doxx people and share personal details about them without their consent.

      • Taldan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        At least some of the negligence is on Google, for the atrocious default security settings in Firebase

        The vulnerability is called hospital gown because they leave the back end wide open by design. It’s not even a traditional vulnerability, since it’s technically working as intended

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 days ago

          In fairness if you leave Firebase in its default settings it won’t shut up about it.

          You get warnings on the website, and constant emails telling you that you’re being a pillocked.

    • Semperverus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Both the company, for failing to protect its users; and a large majority of its users, for doxxing and libel.

      Its unfortunate that it happened this way, but now the people who are being libeled against and doxxed have the ability to find out about it where they didn’t before.

    • aceshigh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      You get 89 cents in the settlement. Do you prefer to get a direct deposit or a check?

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      8 days ago

      It sucks for those people, but everyone should expect anything they say online to be possibly tied back to them. Secrets and identification information don’t mix. Especially online. The good news is that there is no evidence any of it is real, anyone can lie on the site saying whatever they want, so if doxed someone can just say they were bored and wanted to fit in and see what others were discussing or such. Hopefully for them it doesn’t turn into people getting hurt for talking behind someone’s back like it often does offline.