• theherk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    27 days ago

    This is such a garbage take. There is no way to “show our world as it truly is” in two dimensions. I’m all about showing other projects and orientations. Classrooms should have “upside down” maps and Albert maps for example. But we should also teach that each projection has benefits and drawbacks. I was taught that decades ago. Have we stopped?

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      27 days ago

      The way the world’s going, the next accepted projection will be depicted on the backs of four elephants atop a turtle.

    • BehavioralClam@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      27 days ago

      Its the same take that’s applied to any party seen as a “status quo”. Your boss, the CEO, police, the state, movies, everything is “projected” to show something that it isn’t to subtly manipulate the basis of your decisions.

      • theherk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        26 days ago

        What? Map projections are not projected to manipulate you psychologically. They are projected to manipulate a three dimensional object onto a two dimensional surface.

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      27 days ago

      99% of people dont know that there other projections. I dare you to ask people which map projection is their favorite.

      Ideally yes we should stick to standard and make sure everyone knows thay there are many variants and none of them perfectly represent the sphere were on but thats not happening.

      • theherk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        27 days ago

        I don’t believe that 99% figure for a second. Unless geography is removed from all curricula worldwide. Even still, that ignorance would not signify what this movement implies. It is a useful map; end of story. If the movement were, “We should increase public knowledge of geography and how projections work,” fine. But it isn’t.