I also wish ill to JK Rowling.
I just did so on Bluesky. With a “may she rot in hell” cherry on top.
They can suspend me forever for all I care.
I hope JK Rowling gets everything she deserves out of life. I hope life treats her as she does others. I wish upon her the consequences of her actions and words.
lol. She’s rich and safe. Stop stressing yourself out about every little thing and go firebomb an insurance office in her name.
We told them not to use Bluesky and what will eventually happen but they didn’t want to listen
They literally made tons of account on mastodon just to ignore them for this fucking bootleg of it, called bsky
I have a bluesky account on an alternate server, so they can’t ban me for wishing ill on JK Rowling, even if they wanted to.
Um what? The hate for JKR is quite active on bsky. OP smoking crack; we hate that bitch.
No matter what people say about Bluesky, I will always say we should be using mastodon, until Bluesky makes good on true federation, it’s still a platform that can be controlled.
It did make good on true federation.
This is why decentralisation is important. I assume the poster has no way to change Bluesky sites?
Like this is why they should join a Fediverse instance. Like blahaj.zone will probably suit them
I wish JK Rowling’s brain turns into a mush
Oh wait that already happens
The bird site was broken before the psycho took over. Just brought the same shit to the new site.
JK can Rot in Piss for all I care.
Hilarious considering one of their flagship features is community tags for content moderation. You’d think the TERF enablers would suggest tagging it as “non-TERF” or whatever. But no. Fuck em. Bluesky sucks anyways. They have comically short DM lengths and don’t allow images.
Picture not loading
Broke T&Cs got banned, Rowling is irrelevant in this context. You think the T&Cs breach should be ignored because it’s Rowling?
Wishing someone bad fortune is not wishing harm.
Doublespeak
What? Wanting misfortune to befall someone is literally what wishing someone ill means?
My mistake, the misfortune you are wishing is harmless misfortune, I see now
They are absolutely equivalent and it’s ridiculous to argue otherwise.
No they’re not? Wanting the next Harry Potter thing to flop and her lose a bunch of money is wishing misfortune, but it’s hardly wishing harm.
Well it’s one thing to specify you’re wishing harm to her finances. But saying you wish someone ill without specifying absolutely implies wishing them harm.
But saying you wish someone ill without specifying absolutely implies wishing them harm.
IDK, I’ve never taken it to mean wanting harm.
Nah it kinda just sounds like they don’t like her
I wish that her socks always feel damp.
I wish that her sleeves always get wet when she’s washing her hands.
I wish that she always loses when gambling on a fart.
Not trying to defend her at all, but I seriously doubt those are actual examples of the things being said and even if, all of this would cause a regular person psychological distress (or “harm”, even if not physical).
I don’t know how Bulesky’s TOS are worded exactly, but it feels a bit like that whole “Guns don’t kill people, I kill people. With guns.” motif.
Personally, I think wishing harm on people that cause harm is completely OK. As for my wishes, those are inconveniences at most.
Maybe, I can’t really comment on what she did or “deserves” for it. I just know she made some transphobic remarks in the past, which is messed up. But there’s still a difference between someone with a twisted world view and Trump/Putin who actually incarcerate and sponsor torture of people.
However, the discussion was on whether something is “harmful” or not and you may actually argue that her BS doesn’t physically “harm” anyone either, if you try to make that point.
Rowling spends her considerable fortune to actively influence policy to hurt trans people.
I miss the part where that’s my problem
