Tea@programming.dev to

Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month ago

US appeals court says AI authors don't qualify for copyright.

go.theregister.com

7

230

US appeals court says AI authors don't qualify for copyright.

go.theregister.com

Tea@programming.dev to

Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month ago

7

US appeals court says AI authors don't qualify for copyright

go.theregister.com

Updated: Computer scientist Stephen Thaler again told his 'Creativity Machine' can't earn a ©

Computer scientist Stephen Thaler again told his ‘Creativity Machine’ can’t earn a ©

Chat

gimmelemmy@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
arrow-up
3
arrow-down
2·
1 month ago
So, if i rip off an AI author, I will only owe royalties to the author the AI ripped off?

Technology@lemmy.world

technology@lemmy.world

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@lemmy.world

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related news or articles.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

Visibility: Public

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

1.69K users / day
7.62K users / week
14.9K users / month
19.3K users / 6 months
1 local subscriber
69K subscribers
1.98K Posts
25.5K Comments
Modlog