• Photuris@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    84
    ·
    21 days ago

    We didn’t see this one coming a mile away.

    Palantir execs and shareholders are buzzing with anticipation.

  • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    21 days ago

    Dame Rachel de Souza told BBC Newsnight it was “absolutely a loophole that needs closing” and called for age verification on VPNs.

    Saw that coming. Can’t have the populace living their lives without constant, repressive government scrutiny.

  • sunbeam60@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    Do the government ministers understand that setting up your own VPN is literally a 5 minute operation.

    Hire a droplet VM, pre-installed with a server OS. Log in with provided credentials. sudo apt install docker Copy/paste a docker compose file that sets up a wg-easy container. Create a peer. Take a picture of the provided QR code. Connect to the server via a wireguard app. Done.

    Are they going to ban VMs?

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      21 days ago

      Do the government ministers understand that setting up your own VPN is literally a 5 minute operation.

      Of course they don’t. Most of them type with their index fingers and don’t even understand what a VPN is.

      • GreenShimada@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        21 days ago

        Exactly this. There’s maybe 8 politicians in the whole world that understand what a VPN is. They’re told by a lobbyist and donor that it’s a thing that is bad, now they’re out to figure out how to make it go away.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          20 days ago

          I’m sure the VPN industry will bring a lot of money to bear to ensure this doesn’t happen. They like the online safety act itself, because it brings them customers, but if it also causes them to face issues they’re going to be less keen on it.

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      21 days ago

      Are they going to ban VMs?

      They will keep banning things until they feel they have absolute control over the internet.

    • GreenShimada@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      21 days ago

      If someone tells them to, they might try until a few business interests remind them that these are also fundamental components of business networks. Once money tells them to stop it, they will.

      VPN companies should just hire a lobbyist for a week and this will all go away.

    • serenissi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      setting up vps requires money which ideally children do not have access to (not even crypto)

    • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      The VM is associated with your name and payment method. It is about removing privacy so they can remove free speech and other rights. Not about porn. You don’t need a VPN to access porn in the UK. Half the porn sites don’t verify age anyway.

    • TwitchingCheese@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      They’ll ban encrypted Internet traffic that they don’t have a backdoor to steal inspect the contents.

    • Bilb!@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      They could require age verification or even special licensing to use any sort of internet server infrastructure. That’s what I would do if that was my goal.

    • Quazatron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      21 days ago

      I’ve always been fascinated by the lengths puritans will go to prevent kids from seeing mammary glands, while simultaneously being ok with them watching blood and violence.

    • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      21 days ago

      Seriously though. We’ll legislate anything to keep them from seeing stuff they might reasonably expect to see and do one day and glorify things nobody should ever see or experience in person.

  • FUCKING_CUNO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    Dame Rachel told BBC Newsnight: “Of course, we need age verification on VPNs - it’s absolutely a loophole that needs closing and that’s one of my major recommendations.”

    If this fucker had any idea what VPN even stood for they’d realize how fuckin stupid this statement is…

  • IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 days ago

    If they were really after kids watching porn (or even porn in general) it would be technically somewhat simple to force ISPs to provide filters on their end as a subscription service. I’m pretty sure I’ve even heard that kind of services in the past. Make it even opt-out if you really want to.

    That way ISPs would just ban everything from pornhub and others unless you spesifically want it allowed or even provide a portal where you could block reddit, twitter, tumblr or whatever you wish on your account. That kind of technology already exists and it’s used on many corporate setups.

    There’s obviously ways around that, but there’s no technical way to block every possible way to move bits between computers. Even if they would shut down the whole internet there’s still ways to build mesh-networks or even buy USB-drives from a shady alley.

    But as we all know, it’s not about porn and not about children.

    • x00z@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      21 days ago

      You can’t block porn completely without blocking VPNs. If you connect to a VPN that’s all they can see. They can not see what you use the VPN for.

      • IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        21 days ago

        VPN, Tor (and similar, like I2P), every imaginable P2P network, proxies, all non-http protocols (smtp, ftp, nntp, xmpp and other instant messengers and so on) can all transfer any kind of data, porn included. And a ton of other things. Heck, I’m quite sure there’s a minecraft mod where you can assemble JPG-images out of the blocks and view them that way. And then you can use stuff like uuencode where you can use anything that can move plain text to transfer binary data.

        There’s no way to block all of that unless you shut the whole internet down. And even then you can still trade good old playboy-magazines with your friends. VPN in itself has very little to do with the actual problem, beyond that someone apparently noticed that their current “save-the-children” iteration had pretty large holes in it.

  • fluxion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    21 days ago

    Clearly it’s a parental problem to determine if the VPN they are buying for their kids is being used to wank off, but apparently this party of ‘liberty’ has an unhealthy obsession with monitoring our children’s genitalia these days.

    • AlpacaChariot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      21 days ago

      Unfortunately, neither Labour nor Conservatives are parties of liberty, although there are some individuals within both that see the importance.

  • wabafee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    21 days ago

    I think the best way to solve this is to not have kids in the first place.

    • Rooty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      And deprive capital of all that cheap labor? Have you no heart sir/madam?

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    20 days ago

    How about parent your children?

    What about the crappy late night TV channels with the women waving a cordless house phone like it’s 1996?

    I’m perfectly able to watch porn because I’m 45, but I refuse to interact with any of this prove your age bollocks because I know full well that “we won’t store your details” and “we will share your details with 1284 trusted data partners” are the same picture.

  • YappyMonotheist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    21 days ago

    Yeah, it’s just all these children with their bank accounts paying for their VPN subscriptions doing it all… Do they think we’re that stupid? Don’t answer that. 😔

    • Alex@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      21 days ago

      It’s the free VPNs that are the problem. They are privacy nightmares.

      • thr0w4w4y2@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        21 days ago

        If only there was some way the government could have predicted this would happen and maybe not rushed a poorly thought out law in the first place!

        maybe then they would not have:

        • forced big tech companies to withdraw service to the uk
        • forced uk-based small forums and message boards to close
        • given free vpn providers tons more data to sell
        • reduced the overall cyber resilience of the country by forcing people to choose between giving photos of their passports to some weird online service or signing up for a free vpn which sells their data, may inject their own unregulated adverts etc
        • reduced uk based advertising effectiveness and thus investment and marketing spend
        • pissed everyone off while doing it, scoring yet another win for the far right

        absolute roasters the lot of them

          • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            20 days ago

            It’s happening due to a big child sexualization/adultization scandal that took forever to blow up[1]. When the deputies came up with a law that was ready and just sitting in a drawer, my mind immediately went “Oh, fuck”. I still gotta read it, because it was approved recently.


            1. While instagram itself has some “moderation”, they’ll happily turn a blind eye to anything that could hurt engagement. 10yo girls doing extremely sexual dances with pornographic music in the background? Boost that shit, look at the engagement!!! Tiktok is equally at fault for the same reason. This shit has been going for years and predates Hytalo and Felca. ↩︎

  • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    FYI, with Mullvad VPN set to UK, sites that require age verification:

    Sites tha do NOT require age verification:

    And xvideos.com is a bit special since it shows you the thumbnails of porn videos but won’t let you play them.

    But we need to stop VPNs! Think of the whole two children that have VPNs! What if instead of just going to the half of the sites that don’t verify age, they figure out how to use a VPN?! Oh the humanity!

    Yeah, UK wants to de-anonymize VPN users as the next step in their attack on free speech. It is laughable to think this is about anything else.

  • twinnie@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    Everyone’s scared of Reform getting in and yet Reform are the only ones promising to reverse all this. All this is done based off the back of a 2016 survey where parents said they were worried about kids watching porn on the internet, but the survey gave no indication of what a solution would look like and gave no mention to online age verification and banning VPNs.

    • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      21 days ago

      If I had a nickle for ever time the UK did something pants-on-head stupid or short-sighted from a minor survey or public poll, [counts change jar]… How much are big macs these days?

    • gmtom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      21 days ago

      Unfortunately amongst the unwashed masses of the British public this bill isnt actually particularly unpopular.

    • Opisek@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      20 days ago

      Religious fundamentalists famously love being the only source of sexual “education”.