• OctopusNemeses@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      The difference was hundreds of MB, but when you’re working with 8GB every bit counts. At that time KDE had an edge over Gnome. At some point the difference wasn’t there anymore.

      I was rationing what software I had open so as to avoid hitting swap because that’s when there’s a noticeable lag. Gnome was worse at recovering from that.

      • kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        If you want lightweight, KDE is not your best choice. LXQt and Xfce are actually intended for low resource usage.

    • moxymarauder@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      agreed. KDE is pretty much the gold standard of the usability versus resource usage tradeoff, IMHO. From what I’ve seen: Websites/Web Browsers = worst offenders.