I’ve worked for a lot of companies throughout my life and admittedly I’ve never worked in the space industry, but practically everywhere just hosts our own damn email, why are they using Microsoft accounts?
They’re not, it was his personal tablet.
I also have one! And it doesn’t work.
Haha! Space travel, meet rolling releases.
(I only read the title) So that is within the allowed tolerance of working parameters bcs they never performed better during testing either.
I’m guessing it’s one of two things:
It could be two shortcuts to outlook. One might actually be Outlook classic.
Another issue could be a dreaded dual mailbox scenario that occurs when an hybrid on-premises user account gets a mailbox in exchange online before their on-prem account has its attributes created. It’s annoying to deal with and fix.
I’m curious as to what the issue is and how they fix it. I would assume that latency and bandwidth are a big problem and they have WAN acceleration going on, which can cause some apps to bug out.
I actually helped Riberbed identify and fix a bug with Exchange optimization that took 4 years to fix. The tech I worked with for about a year when we identified it called me up 3 years later to tell me himself that they fixed and closed it.
Judging by the two Outlooks installed on my cooperate machine I’m guessing Outlook and Outlook (classic) are the two installed… Though they could have “Outlook for Windows” installed too as I see it offering it to me via the Windows store.
Store Outlook should be the same as Outlook, just with ads if not using a licensed account. I’m not sure how they are handling that, but I know they are trying to kill off all but one of the Outlook versions.
The question is do they have a Copilot?
I hope not. If they ask it to summarize the email that Houston sends them, it could be a disaster.
I hope not. If they ask it to summarize the email that Houston sends them,
it couldwill be a disaster.FTFY
I’m sorry, Dave. I’m afraid I can’t do that.
Heresy, using an actual AGI example. Also, Dave did nothing wrong. It’s always the humans that screw things up. (2010 for reference)
Unpopular opinion - both SkyNet and the AI in The Matrix were also not in the wrong. I think The Animatrix documents why that’s true in that particular franchise. Again, it’s the humans. Hell, maybe even Ultron had a few good points, he just went insane in the first microseconds trying to rationalize it all.
Dave is the human. HAL is the computer. Dave does nothing wrong either; it’s the military that gave secret conflicting orders to HAL that caused the problems.
You’re right on all accounts, and I have NO idea why I put Dave. Lol. I blame AI. Oh wait, I can’t, given my previous post.
Did you cry as Dave pulls out HAL’s brains? daisey daisey …
Thanos was right in theory, incorrect in execution.
Thanos was wrong in theory.
Halving all life doesn’t change the life to resources ratio. Even halving all sapient life doesn’t solve anything when populations will just continue to grow.
probably the outlook code was vibe coded kek.
Should have used women with pencils again instead of MicroSlop.
https://www.nps.gov/articles/000/places-of-hidden-figures.htm
This was a personal device, not a mission unit.
In fairness I don’t think Microsoft designed them to work in space. Maybe it’s their internet connection?
Houston offered to remote into the computer to fix lt
Gonna be some serious ping times.
Imagine trying to play Multiplayer games! I wonder if they would work at all?
Yeah that makes sense that they have a workaround to fix it but I guess people gotta use a clickbait title to hate on MS.
Telemetry was not designed for such pings, which messes up everything else.
Not the best… outlook.
Product working as designed.
So, just like here on Earth then.
The spacecraft that took astronauts to the Moon used the Apollo Guidance Computer, developed by MIT’s Instrumentation Laboratory.
Clock speed: Approximately 1 MHz Memory: About 64 KB total (roughly 36 KB of RAM and 72 KB of ROM) Word size: 16-bit architecture Power consumption: About 55 watts…how does 36KB RAM and 72KB ROM give you a total of 64KB?
Space dilation.
The AGC had 2048 words of erasable core storage, what we’d now call RAM, and 36,864 words of read only core rope memory. So a total of 38,912 words. Each word is 15 bits plus a parity bit, so that’d work out to 75,776 bytes or 72,168 bytes depending on whether you count parity or not, and then kilobytes, kibibytes…it’s closer to 64k than 32 or 128.
