• Let's Go 2 the Mall! ❌👑@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    103
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    I hope they lose billions on this deal. I know I’m only going with AMD now. It’s not much, but I do buy all the tech for my company. Servers, laptops, etc… will all be AMD going forward.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Literally illegal. Only AMD and Intel have the patent cross-licensing rights to make x86 chips. There used to be a third company (Cyrix and subsequently VIA), and (maybe?) still is, but it hasn’t been relevant to the desktop CPU market in decades.

        The real competition will come from ARM-based computers.

        • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          4 months ago

          We don’t need competition in the x86 space, we need competition in the mobile/desktop/server space. That could easily be performance competitive ARM or RISC-v or whatever. Better even with diversity of design.

          • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            Enterprise ARM servers exist, I’ve used them, they’re neat.

            With a proper stack you don’t even notice they’re arm

      • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Competitor is already here. Apple and Ampere are making ARM systems that fit most users needs. There are ARM servers. But people don’t want to switch.

        • Pycorax@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Apple doesn’t really exist as a competitor for a number of industries and use cases due to not officially supporting anything other than OSX so I’m not sure if they’re a fair comparison here.

          The only real edge they have is in non-gaming related consumer workloads.

          • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            They do fine with content creation. Windows 11 has been such a bear many are moving back, and the m-series mac mini is a surprisingly capable little box that’s not offensively priced.

            Asahi Linux has made fantastic progress too. It’s really just bare metal windows that’s a problem anymore on these and nobody wants windows anymore anyways. It’s just what they have. Outside of gaming it’s largely unnesscarry to use windows in 2025.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          No. AMD is fabless; TSMC doesn’t design chips. They’re in different parts of the supply chain.

          In fact, AMD is a customer of TSMC.

    • killerscene@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      intel must still be hanging on purely based on corporate computers? or is there something else they are a large part of?

      this just be in my bubble, but i feel like anyone i know over the last 15 years has been exclusively getting AMD, whether theyre tech savvy or just a regular consumer.