US immigration agents will have access to one of the world’s most sophisticated hacking tools after a decision by the Trump administration to move ahead with a contract with Paragon Solutions, a company founded in Israel which makes spyware that can be used to hack into any mobile phone – including encrypted applications.

The Department of Homeland Security first entered into a contract with Paragon, now owned by a US firm, in late 2024, under the Biden administration. But the $2m contract was put on hold pending a compliance review to make sure it adhered to an executive order that restricts the US government’s use of spyware, Wired reported at the time.

That pause has now been lifted, according to public procurement documents, which list US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) as the contracting agency.

  • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    11 days ago

    I already know the answer to this, but I’m going to ask if anyway.

    How did we go from the most paranoid group of people choosing death over vaccinations bc of government surveillance conspiracies, literally storming the capital in an uprising over false rumors, and now that we have multiple confirmations of the most insane and ongoing 1984 government surveillance programs: fucking crickets?

    • rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      12 days ago

      Every early morning. Mine is right before my alarm goes off, so the notification sounds just meld.

      Also, no one should be using biometric data to log into thier phones. 6 digit pin isn’t very obtrusive once you get used to it

        • rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          12 days ago

          Sure bro, put a 30 character password into your phone every time you want to find the nearest fucking coffee shop.

          edit: I guess I should explain. I’m into privacy not necessarily absolute security. If a cop wants in my phone I forgot my PIN. There’s no biometric to get into it so he’s going to have to get a warrant if he wants anything to actually stick. With face ID he just holds it up to my face. With fingerprint he can force my finger onto the sensor. In the USA, don’t know about Europe.

          • lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            12 days ago

            I just needed this info out there, I don’t really care what you do - I just need to make sure Lemmy stays safe and you’re spouting leaky insecurity disguised as best practices.

            Best of luck

            • rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              12 days ago

              I think I just leaked a little right now. I don’t believe you have a 30 character unlock on your phone. That doesn’t make sense on a device someone uses multiple times a day in one hand at like a bus stop or something.

              And I’m no security professional, just some dumbass out in the street.

              • lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                12 days ago

                Of course I do. FaceID allows me to input it exactly once a week, sometimes less.

                What don’t you understand?

              • choochooMF@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                12 days ago

                I use a 15 character pw with a mix of upper and lower case, numbers, and symbols, which according to that link is pretty damn good.

              • Tangent5280@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 days ago

                30 characters is like five words. Entirely doable. You can take your favorite TV show, sort character names by some logic and mispell a few of them to make a very strong very long password.

          • lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            12 days ago

            With biometrics I only enter it once a week, at the very most. It’s insane to me that people want their phones to be less secure, but best of luck to you and your super secure TSA lock on your phone lol

          • lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            12 days ago

            If you’re in the USA and a cop gets your phone they’re going to pop it onto a graybox and will be digging through your shit up to their elbows. I wish I were wrong

      • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        worthless when there’s cameras in every corner that record as you unlock your phone all 40 times through the day

        • rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 days ago

          Fuck you too, buddy. You’re being recorded as you input your absurdly long password into your phone. They probably got it on camera. haha

  • 3abas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    12 days ago

    For the Democrats/liberals who think they’re leftist in the room, note that this done by Biden, how it was put on hold for review so that news spread and pacifies the anger, and how it came back stronger when you forgot about it. And now Democrats will shrug and say “Trump is in charge, we’re powerles.”

    Democrats are not your friends, they are not a lesser evil, we need a revolution.

    • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      Based on what has already happened, I’d definitely say Dems are the lesser evil. That’s literally what this means in this context. Still evil, just not as much as Donald dump.

    • hornedfiend@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      Not defending democrats here, but it says it was halted pending reviews. I would say at least the democrats have some sense of following rules, while under the Trump administration, these were immediately lifted.

      Make of it what you will, but it’s pretty clear that following the laws/rules is a thing of the past in the US of A.

      • 3abas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 days ago

        They have theatrics, it would have ended up the same way if Biden/Harris won. Democrats (Biden) introduced it in the first place, and your instinct is still to believe they opposed it?

    • Smoogs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      12 days ago

      Dems didn’t invent ice.

      Nor Epstein

      Nor trump.

      Voters need to take some culpability to their own mistakes here and stop blaming it on anyone else but themselves for this shit show they created.

      • BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        ICE was created by the Homeland Security Act of 2002, which passed with overwhelming bipartisan support. 90-9 in the senate and 42 Yeas came from Dems.

  • Taldan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 days ago

    It has also said it has a no tolerance policy and will cut off government clients who use the spyware to target members of civil society, such as journalists

    Citizen Labs confirmed joirnalists have been targeted

    Nice of The Guardian to repeat their obvious lie without immediately calling it out. This is just NSO Group 2.0. They’re moving all the engineers over because even the US was willing to sanction NSO Group after everything they did

  • angband@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 days ago

    this just brings them on par with local LEOs. these cabinets have charging ports and run brute force attacks on pins and passcodes, at least the simplest and cheapest options do.

  • Mohamad20ZX@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 days ago

    Yeah to hell when they’re belong freaking hypocrites always trying to silence the truth about killing in Gaza

    • Smoogs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      Blaming it on dems that you voted Republican?

      It’s your finger on the trigger with the gun to your own head. That’s not biden’s. This is how people with mental illness sociopathy reason their actions. Manipulation and unreasonable rules that never hold themselves accountable to themselves.

    • sqgl@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      Historically, NSO has avoided selling to US-based clients and was banned by the US Commerce Department under President Joe Biden’s administration for allegedly supplying spyware to authoritarian governments. However, shifting political dynamics under the Trump administration raised the possibility that spyware could become more prevalent in the United States, exacerbating mobile exploitation

      https://www.zdnet.com/article/rebooting-your-phone-daily-is-your-best-defense-against-zero-click-attacks-heres-why/

    • Schlemmy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      12 days ago

      And for anyone else, anywhere in the world.

      Giving governments tools to fight crime that can also invade your privacy is a sure path to governments invading your privacy for any reason they deem righteous. If not the current one, surely the next one.

        • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          12 days ago

          No no, anytime someone criticizes a democrat it’s because they love Trump. The democrats are infallible and above reproach you see, so the only reason you’d say anything they ever did was bad it’s because you’re a nazi childkiller who wants a dictator.

          It’s probably not dangerous at all that we’ve positioned the US as either “uncritical support of the dems or you’re a nazi,” letting a party become unquestionable is good for sure, nothing bad could ever come of that.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 days ago

            I, for one, unquestionably support whatever group gets me upvotes on social media. Gavin Newsom to the moon!

            Seriously though, neither party seems interested in fielding a good candidate. My request isn’t ridiculous, I just want someone who loves democracy and wants to make things better for Americans and the world.

            • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              11 days ago

              Unfortunately, looking at our track record, it does seem that may be a ridiculous request lmao. I’m with you 100% on that though!

              • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 days ago

                I’m not a fan of Bernie Sanders’ policies, but I would’ve voted for him had he won in 2016. I’m not a fan of many of Ron Paul’s policies, but again, I would’ve voted for him. Those two are polar opposites, but I believe both would do what they think is best for Americans and the world. But no, we got Clinton and Trump…

                I just want someone who wants to serve the country, but instead they serve themselves and their party.

                • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  11 days ago

                  Oddly I agree, I’d have voted for either of those opposites as well. Though, I do agree with both of them on some things, and disagree with both of them on others.

                  Ideally I’d actually have them run together and temper each other’s views a little to land somewhere more reasonable, but no we have to pick from the two of the worst, most self serving people available instead.

    • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 days ago

      When politicians say “israel is our greatest ally” they aren’t lying.

      Their definition of “our” just doesn’t include us