schizoidman@lemmy.zip to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 months ago'It doesn’t catch fire': Why China’s "fireproof" sodium battery could be the breakthrough that makes EVs safer than ICE carswww.techradar.comexternal-linkmessage-square186linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10file-textcross-posted to: world@lemmy.world
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-link'It doesn’t catch fire': Why China’s "fireproof" sodium battery could be the breakthrough that makes EVs safer than ICE carswww.techradar.comschizoidman@lemmy.zip to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 months agomessage-square186linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: world@lemmy.world
minus-squarehitmyspot@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·7 months agoNo, that’s not the same thing. Something being used in a more dangerous way doesn’t make it more dangerous or more unsafe. Driving a car at speed along a cliff in the dark in the rain is more unsafe than driving it slowly in an empty car park. It’s the same car.
minus-squareBad_Ideas_In_Bulk@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·7 months agoIf I included a self destruct button beside the AC controls and claimed that it was driver error that was the problem, how credible would that be?
No, that’s not the same thing. Something being used in a more dangerous way doesn’t make it more dangerous or more unsafe.
Driving a car at speed along a cliff in the dark in the rain is more unsafe than driving it slowly in an empty car park. It’s the same car.
If I included a self destruct button beside the AC controls and claimed that it was driver error that was the problem, how credible would that be?